353 Comments

Hmm, is that really a 7/23/19?

There appear to be two other 7s on the line above, (7801, 7066) and the handwriting in both cases puts has horizontal bar through the stem of the 7, which is how I write my 7s for whatever reason, probably because I had a teacher who did that.

It doesn't really look like the 9 in the /19, either, although I'm obviously not a handwriting expert. It kind of looks like a 2, which makes me wonder if it's 12/23/19 and the 1 isn't strong enough to pick up.

December would still be really early, though right?

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

I am new to reading "2019 Novel Coronavirus Vaccine" dated July 23 2019? Making a vaccine 6 months before the pathogen officially appeared?

Igor Chudov

Mar 19, 2022

I am not new to the possible origins which may date even before 2019. Ron Unz explores with many facts that SarsCov2 is a bioweapon released at the 2019 Wuhan War Games by the US participants. His writing places no blame just the facts as he has come by them. Worth a read.

https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

Expand full comment
Sep 30, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

The date on the box looks more like 9/23/19, not 7/3/19.

The reason is that the writer puts a European slash through their sevens, seen also on the box.

The first number looks more like the 9 in 19, without a slash.

Expand full comment

There's more - Moderna had to get out of it's contract with Merck, in May 2019 before they could sign the research collaboration agreement with NIAID. Merck had exclusive rights to a "specific set of respiratory infections'

Expand full comment

The Fort Detrick horror: a closer look at the US’ largest biochemical weapons research center

Days before the institution's temporary shutdown in 2019, a respiratory illness was reported on June 30 at a community one hour's drive away. The Greenspring Retirement Community in Fairfax County, Virginia, had had 63 infected cases of the disease and three deaths by July 15, said local health authorities.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1189967.shtml

"I can confirm that during my visit to Washington DC last Christmas/ New Year I was informed that the US DoD were responsible for both the virus and the vaccines. Fort Detrick was named. Also a facility in Canada. (1/2)

https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1634861570957225984

Mysterious Respiratory illness hit Fairfax County in N. Virginia in 7/2019, only 50 miles away from Fort Detrick lab. In 8/2019, this deadly germ military research operation was shut down following serious safety violations.

https://twitter.com/JenZhan71273737/status/1517598239008202755

Covid + Fort Detrick

https://twitter.com/search?q=Covid%20Fort%20Detrick&src=typed_query&f=live

Expand full comment

That’s a solid foundation upon which to build the full evidence base for all court actions. We know that SARS COV2 wa engineered, primarily at labs in Chapel Hill North Carolina with Dr Ralph Baric as principal investigator splicing in the H1N1 codon as part of the gain of function to enhance the pathogenicity of this novel chimeric virus….the subsequently sent to the WIV lab where it escaped or was released into wild, where US culpability could be minimized due to lack of proximity to initial infectious cases. Do I have that about right?

Expand full comment

looks to me like 9/23/19 rather than 7. September also aligns better with the "grave and complex situation" in Wuhan and the removal of the WIV virus DB from the web at the end of the month.

Expand full comment

If you go to my pinned thread on twitter @1StacyPhillips you'll see the moderna patents on down the thread.

Expand full comment

Yes. Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine patent was originally filed in the Spring of 2019, then amended in 2019 to include something about a concern for "deliberate release" (of the virus). They worked with NIH scientists to develop the vaccine, and the NIH even sued them the following year for not putting them on the patent. Wish I could send you a screenshot.

Expand full comment

I don't mean to be a wet blanket here, but there are many people who re-use those boxes (we always did) and the old dates written in permanent marker are sometimes not crossed-off. Sometimes, because I have Reynaud's and it was painful to go in and out of the -70 freezers, I would sometimes even leave the labels off the outside of the boxes, and put the labels that I had written on the warm bench on the inside of the box. :) Just a point of note.

Expand full comment

The label on that one agar sample says "WUCOV S-2P Fd PN1 1/2 OA 01/24/2020"

"WUCOV?"

"Yeah, that's just another corona virus sample from Wuhan. We get a shipment every week. Just business as usual. Nothing to see here. Hey remember when that UPS delivery driver forced a shipment through the mail slot and it broke open and we got agar all over the floor? Ha. Good times."

Expand full comment

The confluence of events being what they are, I can at least say that having worked in many labs with -80 freezers that'

-boxes get moved around

-boxes get reused constantly

-boxes get forgotten about and live forever as balls of frost.

It's interesting but the date probably is covered by laziness, though I don't know the NIHs lab sop and how strict they would be about labeling

Expand full comment

The date in the box is 9/23/19, not 7/23/19

Expand full comment

Fort Detrick was shutdown in summer 2019 due to safety failures. Please watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Xe1qAptO4

Expand full comment

Novel coronavirus or novel vaccine? What did the label really mean?

Expand full comment