And when we find confirmation of our fears? Then what?
How do we even get the message out? I think one of the most pressing issues we face is the near silence on the streets due to MSM spin and difficulty advertising the findings.
I have from the early inception of the vaccine roll out been incredibly concerned about the epigenetic/mutagenic potential of these jabs.
I have CFS/M.E which is a rather frustrating illness. Especially for a guy who used to be a special operations army medic, a competitive boxer, adventure sport enthusiast and spear fisher. Gone are my hobbies. My career aspirations. I exist, battling fatigue most days. If I manage my diet, rest, sleep well I still have a sharp mind. If I do not manage my energy... well I lose that too. I become a prisoner in my own body.
But one does not go from one state to another without resistance.
I spent the last six years analyzing the data from various fields as to what causes CFS/M.E and how it could be treated. To no avail. I am still tired.
I looked wider into other conditions with similar albiet slightly different presenations. Gulf war syndrome, post lyme disease to see if there were hints there too.
What I discovered however is that we have a lot to learn. We can see the stars above us. We know they are there. But knowing they're there and being able to be amongst them, harnessing their energy is a very different beast.
We are messing around with a technology that needs another 100 years of study. Worse... we are releasing it widely completely blind.
Feb 28, 2022·edited Feb 28, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
I think we are finding out why the China Military encouraged Gates, Soros, and Fauci to do Gain of Function research and build research facilities in China. They used the psychotic greedy bastards to genetically destroy us. Everything I have read says China was, “you guys test that mRNA crap on your people first. We’ll watch. If mRNA doesn’t work with the WuFlu we will send another virus back with your Olympic athletes so you can make more money.”
This is ridiculous that this person just posts it anonymously on the Internet, and can live with what they've created. We need more whistleblowers to come forward, not some weak 4chan post. This makes me really sad for society - in case it wasn't already sad enough.
Just thinking out loud here but, if this infertility is by design, it's a pretty slow way to reduce the population, isn't it? So babies born from 2022 onwards aren't going to be having babies of their own until 2042+ & the world population continues skyrocketing in the meantime? Have I missed something? And then there's the poor countries who never got vaccinated & generally poor countries are countries with high birth rates? So is this a very bizarrely slow way to stop the reproduction of western people, 20 years on from now? Don't get me wrong, I don't trust these pharma companies (otherwise I wouldn't be here) but either I've misunderstood something or this is a very round-a-bout way to achieve an end.
The genocidal maniacs KNEW what they were doing, these horrors are in fact their calculated plan to cull "useless eaters."
Premeditated GENOCIDE: The FDA and the SEC were aware of "Undesirable Side Effects" of experimental Gene Therapy masqueraded as "Safe and Effective" vaccines
You just wait and see - Pfizer and the rest of the bastards will keep their heads down. Worst comes to worst, they'll licquitade and restructure and play corporate musical chairs and reincarnate as a totally new corporation with none of the old baggage but somehow still owning all the patents.
And then? Taking a cue from agri-business, you (threaten to) sue anyone who carries their product without paying the license fee. Such as these children if your hypotheses holds true:
"Oh, you took those jabs and boosers and then managed to concieve? Well, if you pursue litigation for damages due to the vaccine you got, we'll countersue your child for IP infringement and theft."
Anyone think a corporation wouldn't dare pull such a stunt doesn't know enough about how corporations behave. Always have behaved.
Of course, I'm pretty much speculating here.
There simply is no depth a capitalist won't sink to in pursuit of profit. None.
It's thinking that a group of people would do this intentionally is what I have trouble accepting.
About ten years ago I attended a small speech by Ted Turner about the buffalo industry, in which he controls a majority of those animals. Smart man, extremely charismatic. Apparently he has four wives who live in a separate houses and he rotates through them, spending three months with each, but that isn't relevant.
His Southern charm was infectious, especially when talking about raising buffalo for food, until someone asked about clearing out humans from huge swaths of the northwest so Elk could have their natural migration paths back. It was like a flip of a coin. He advocated for this, and all the disruption and destruction it would bring, and his vehemence in lowering human interests to below the Elk was filled with psychopathic darkness.
If Turner - a bipolar billionaire emotionally numbed with Lithium - were funding this, I wouldn't have trouble believing. He can't be the only person like this, so maybe I should reevaluate my first sentence.
Here is that 4chan archive of that post. For those curious the original posters come back. They were scared and seeing what I have seen last couple years they had good reason to be….warning salty language lol
It will be difficult to convince an injected CovIDIOT to beat off into a test tube... cuz they will not want to know that they've sterilized themselves... because that would admit that they have been played. Maybe Steve Kirsch could offer some $$$ to the CovIDIOTS to participate in the studies...
I agree that the 4chan post looks knowledgeable, but this has been a year for not listening to knowledgeable-sounding experts, so I'll offer a crack at it. The problem is that it suggests the genetic insertion of recessive mutations as a way of insidiously affecting infertility. Now, keep in mind that recessive mutations act not by what they do, but by what they don't do. A recessive mutation that causes cancer (an oncogene) is usually a train-wrecked gene that was supposed to prevent cancer. As long as it's paired up with a working version of itself, then all is well. This claim in the 4chan post essentially states that a paperweight is being inserted into the genome. If that's the case, then one would think that unless it has the ability to target and excise the healthy version of itself, the real CDKN1B gene, then its greatest risk is that it will plop itself down randomly in the middle of something important, disrupting the function of the victim gene. If so, then it will contribute greatly to the over-all ill health of the population, but getting two disruptions of the same gene will be much less likely. In other words, giving us a recessively mutated gene will never have the kind of effect suggested, because we will always have the natural gene in place to prevent a double-recessive situation. This can only have an effect if the sequence has the ability to target and destroy the function of the existing gene in the host genome. If the mutated gene has an active function and produces some manner of enzyme that interferes with function, then it will not be recessive.
Thanks for another post emphasizing the significant concerns we're faced with and how these can be tested.
I saw in the previous post, you were looking to see if there could be any experts around who could 'check your work' so to say.
In case you haven't crossed paths yet, I'd like to bring to your attention Chris Masterjohn PhD (nutritional sciences, and he often goes deep into the biological pathways during his writings, https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/covid-19/ He has recently interviewed Stephanie Seneff and Jessica Rose)
This is a sick comedy at this point. We need a math head to crunch this now that it is known, I do not know the proper equation yet though.
If true, and vaccinated parents reproduce and produce this 100% in their children -- so infertile children -- how many generations?
Also, it would see the unvaccinated within the group could then sustain population -- but not growth. It may then also be possible for an unvaccinated to have children with the vaccinated and get a child with the trait, but not active, but how latent and could it be handed down from there?
It would effectively mean eventual sterilization for any bloodline that mated with vaccinated people, at any point in the future of mankind.
Contact Steve K - we can get this funded. If this is true we need to know now as recessive genes can skip a generation too.
And when we find confirmation of our fears? Then what?
How do we even get the message out? I think one of the most pressing issues we face is the near silence on the streets due to MSM spin and difficulty advertising the findings.
I have from the early inception of the vaccine roll out been incredibly concerned about the epigenetic/mutagenic potential of these jabs.
I have CFS/M.E which is a rather frustrating illness. Especially for a guy who used to be a special operations army medic, a competitive boxer, adventure sport enthusiast and spear fisher. Gone are my hobbies. My career aspirations. I exist, battling fatigue most days. If I manage my diet, rest, sleep well I still have a sharp mind. If I do not manage my energy... well I lose that too. I become a prisoner in my own body.
But one does not go from one state to another without resistance.
I spent the last six years analyzing the data from various fields as to what causes CFS/M.E and how it could be treated. To no avail. I am still tired.
I looked wider into other conditions with similar albiet slightly different presenations. Gulf war syndrome, post lyme disease to see if there were hints there too.
What I discovered however is that we have a lot to learn. We can see the stars above us. We know they are there. But knowing they're there and being able to be amongst them, harnessing their energy is a very different beast.
We are messing around with a technology that needs another 100 years of study. Worse... we are releasing it widely completely blind.
I think we are finding out why the China Military encouraged Gates, Soros, and Fauci to do Gain of Function research and build research facilities in China. They used the psychotic greedy bastards to genetically destroy us. Everything I have read says China was, “you guys test that mRNA crap on your people first. We’ll watch. If mRNA doesn’t work with the WuFlu we will send another virus back with your Olympic athletes so you can make more money.”
This is ridiculous that this person just posts it anonymously on the Internet, and can live with what they've created. We need more whistleblowers to come forward, not some weak 4chan post. This makes me really sad for society - in case it wasn't already sad enough.
I guess the time for hoping to be wrong has long gone
Just thinking out loud here but, if this infertility is by design, it's a pretty slow way to reduce the population, isn't it? So babies born from 2022 onwards aren't going to be having babies of their own until 2042+ & the world population continues skyrocketing in the meantime? Have I missed something? And then there's the poor countries who never got vaccinated & generally poor countries are countries with high birth rates? So is this a very bizarrely slow way to stop the reproduction of western people, 20 years on from now? Don't get me wrong, I don't trust these pharma companies (otherwise I wouldn't be here) but either I've misunderstood something or this is a very round-a-bout way to achieve an end.
Another great article , thank you Igor!
The genocidal maniacs KNEW what they were doing, these horrors are in fact their calculated plan to cull "useless eaters."
Premeditated GENOCIDE: The FDA and the SEC were aware of "Undesirable Side Effects" of experimental Gene Therapy masqueraded as "Safe and Effective" vaccines
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/premeditated-genocide-pfizer-mrna
You just wait and see - Pfizer and the rest of the bastards will keep their heads down. Worst comes to worst, they'll licquitade and restructure and play corporate musical chairs and reincarnate as a totally new corporation with none of the old baggage but somehow still owning all the patents.
And then? Taking a cue from agri-business, you (threaten to) sue anyone who carries their product without paying the license fee. Such as these children if your hypotheses holds true:
"Oh, you took those jabs and boosers and then managed to concieve? Well, if you pursue litigation for damages due to the vaccine you got, we'll countersue your child for IP infringement and theft."
Anyone think a corporation wouldn't dare pull such a stunt doesn't know enough about how corporations behave. Always have behaved.
Of course, I'm pretty much speculating here.
There simply is no depth a capitalist won't sink to in pursuit of profit. None.
It's thinking that a group of people would do this intentionally is what I have trouble accepting.
About ten years ago I attended a small speech by Ted Turner about the buffalo industry, in which he controls a majority of those animals. Smart man, extremely charismatic. Apparently he has four wives who live in a separate houses and he rotates through them, spending three months with each, but that isn't relevant.
His Southern charm was infectious, especially when talking about raising buffalo for food, until someone asked about clearing out humans from huge swaths of the northwest so Elk could have their natural migration paths back. It was like a flip of a coin. He advocated for this, and all the disruption and destruction it would bring, and his vehemence in lowering human interests to below the Elk was filled with psychopathic darkness.
If Turner - a bipolar billionaire emotionally numbed with Lithium - were funding this, I wouldn't have trouble believing. He can't be the only person like this, so maybe I should reevaluate my first sentence.
This could be done privately I guess? I mean, the government and big pharma aren't going to do it or give attention to it.
How much would such a study cost?
I'm curious, what is the successful birthrate in late 2021 into 2022 compared to the previous year? Really, where is this data?
Here is that 4chan archive of that post. For those curious the original posters come back. They were scared and seeing what I have seen last couple years they had good reason to be….warning salty language lol
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/295621351/#295621351
It will be difficult to convince an injected CovIDIOT to beat off into a test tube... cuz they will not want to know that they've sterilized themselves... because that would admit that they have been played. Maybe Steve Kirsch could offer some $$$ to the CovIDIOTS to participate in the studies...
I agree that the 4chan post looks knowledgeable, but this has been a year for not listening to knowledgeable-sounding experts, so I'll offer a crack at it. The problem is that it suggests the genetic insertion of recessive mutations as a way of insidiously affecting infertility. Now, keep in mind that recessive mutations act not by what they do, but by what they don't do. A recessive mutation that causes cancer (an oncogene) is usually a train-wrecked gene that was supposed to prevent cancer. As long as it's paired up with a working version of itself, then all is well. This claim in the 4chan post essentially states that a paperweight is being inserted into the genome. If that's the case, then one would think that unless it has the ability to target and excise the healthy version of itself, the real CDKN1B gene, then its greatest risk is that it will plop itself down randomly in the middle of something important, disrupting the function of the victim gene. If so, then it will contribute greatly to the over-all ill health of the population, but getting two disruptions of the same gene will be much less likely. In other words, giving us a recessively mutated gene will never have the kind of effect suggested, because we will always have the natural gene in place to prevent a double-recessive situation. This can only have an effect if the sequence has the ability to target and destroy the function of the existing gene in the host genome. If the mutated gene has an active function and produces some manner of enzyme that interferes with function, then it will not be recessive.
Any way, that's my take on it.
Dear Igor,
Thanks for another post emphasizing the significant concerns we're faced with and how these can be tested.
I saw in the previous post, you were looking to see if there could be any experts around who could 'check your work' so to say.
In case you haven't crossed paths yet, I'd like to bring to your attention Chris Masterjohn PhD (nutritional sciences, and he often goes deep into the biological pathways during his writings, https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/covid-19/ He has recently interviewed Stephanie Seneff and Jessica Rose)
He was recently discussing the Swedish reverse transcription study, and having to fend off the pharma trolls: https://twitter.com/ChrisMasterjohn/status/1497556655466287106
His substack is here: https://chrismasterjohnphd.substack.com/
Anyway, I post this in the off chance your two minds can collaborate, and strengthen each others' research in our very treacherous times.
This is a sick comedy at this point. We need a math head to crunch this now that it is known, I do not know the proper equation yet though.
If true, and vaccinated parents reproduce and produce this 100% in their children -- so infertile children -- how many generations?
Also, it would see the unvaccinated within the group could then sustain population -- but not growth. It may then also be possible for an unvaccinated to have children with the vaccinated and get a child with the trait, but not active, but how latent and could it be handed down from there?
It would effectively mean eventual sterilization for any bloodline that mated with vaccinated people, at any point in the future of mankind.
I want to be wrong Igor.