This lady was from my home town Saskatoon Saskatchewan. They're covering all deaths. My aunt died 48 hours after her second dose of Pfizer. From a stroke and brain bleed. Her death was ruled as cancer. Even though she'd been fine. Out for pancakes as usual. then her shot. I gave her heck . Then she passed away ~ Cancer?? Not buying it.
The thing is that all deaths, ultimately, are of natural causes. It’s a weaselly meaningless phrase. If I cut off someone’s head, they’ll die of a natural cause - blood loss.
The question to be answered in any death is whether & how previous events precipitated the ‘natural cause’ in question. If this poor woman died of a heart attack, or a stroke, yes that’s a natural cause - but just shouting ‘natural cause’ is utterly irrelevant to the question of what role if any the vaccine played in precipitating that cause.
In this sense the authorities aren’t even denying the vaccine played a role - they’re just completely ignoring the question and hoping no one notices.
If this woman had died seven minutes after receiving an injection of heroin, it would be reported as a drug overdose, guaranteed. I wonder if anyone else waiting in that drugstore for their bivalent booster kept their appointment after that tragedy? A longtime friend of my wife’s announced a few days ago that she was getting one of those boosters. My wife pleaded with her not to do it. The friend replied,
“I don’t want to talk about it.” I’m still trying to understand her response; it doesn’t make sense to me other than she must be more afraid of covid than the jab.
Was she salvageable? Setting aside whether or not we should save people from their own idiocy, can we? That's a question we don't ask enough. If you're stupid enough to take the bivalent vaccine, how can anyone stop you? Would we outlaw these vaccines? Shoot people who buy & sell them? Or treat it like other "illegal" drugs? I don't mean to sound uncaring, but rather I want to ask a serious question: can these people be saved? I think you probably can't save these people. Indeed, even if you saved them from this, they'd kill themselves in some other way.
If we truly want to save these people, we need to think about what led them want these things - it's a more fundamental problem than focusing on the particular thing that killed them as the particular thing will change too quickly & too frequently for us to save them.
Gosh I saw this doing the rounds and couldn’t tell if it was a fake or not. Natural causes. 7 minutes. I’ll bet $100 this would be written up as a Covid death if it happened within 7 days of infection, let alone 7 minutes.
No not at all. Someone, and many many others, need to be put to the gallows. On live stream. At this point, none of this can be considered anything short of pre-meditated murder.
Should we test this on more than 8 mice before rolling it out to billions of people? Great question. I think if any of the people realized that was true they would hesitate to get this particular injection. They are lied to and they trust. They are wrong but they should be right.
Meanwhile most of my family, like Carol, think this is based on science and will happily line up to be injected again. Even the sister in law that just about died from a massive blood clot a week after her last booster is willing to get another. Such a sad time to live through....
It would be interesting to know what vaccine effect could kill in 7 minutes. Anaphylactic shock maybe? But presumably the adjuvants and lipid nanoparticles are identical to her previous shots, so why would she have a reaction to this one?
It's a shame they are trying to sweep it under the rug instead of learning from it.
Is there some point where we let people be responsible for their own choices? It's been a solid 3 years of this...if people haven't done any independent research and are still on board with all of this, I'm kindly asking, is there room for us to honor their choices and let them deal with the consequences?
Well but really, when you really get down to it, unless something manifested out of an alternate universe and took her out with some kind of unphysical death ray, it MUST be naturally caused. I mean inject somebody with poison, jab them with a stick, shoot them… Its all natural.
If she had died 5 minutes after the shot, then yes, it would have been related. But 7 minutes? Probably not related.
We had friends who were very fit and healthy and in their 30s and they went on vacation with their two children. When they returned the husband developed serious blood clots during the return flight in his legs. They asked the doctors if it was related to the vaccine and the doctor said that if the blood clots had been within two weeks of vaccination, it probably would’ve been related but because it was three weeks out, they said it wasn’t related.
They knew. We all know. This is a shameless charade.
Legally the vaccine is the cause of death. And as long as these injections are under EUA/are experimental, ANY illness/accident/death is considered vaccine related.
It sounds similar to the case of that unfortunate young woman in Iran who died tragically shortly after being beaten by the Iranian "morality police" for the crime of wearing a loose fitting hijab. The mullahs claim it is just a coincidence and she died of natural causes. Saskatchewan Health seems to have a similar mentality, and contempt for the intelligence of the general public. She died "coincidentally" of "natural causes" after being subjected to a novel/experimental gene therapy. How stupid does Saskatchewan Health think people are to believe that? Unfortunately, Saskatchewan Health has probably got the public figured out accurately. There are a lot of marks who believe BS very easily. Many gullible people believed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction even though even people with an intellectual disability, provided they were not also gullible, were able to correctly deduce that was a pile of stinking BS. Saskatchewan Health denies the jab killed her, even though she was dead within 7 minutes of the jab. It brings to mind Otto Von Bismarck's famous statement: "Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." Saskatchewan Health would have foreseen that death could be a result of the jab, and it appears it was. Not surprised they are engaged in a cover up. In several jurisdictions, their actions would probably give rise to suspicions of callous disregard or depraved heart murder.
This lady was from my home town Saskatoon Saskatchewan. They're covering all deaths. My aunt died 48 hours after her second dose of Pfizer. From a stroke and brain bleed. Her death was ruled as cancer. Even though she'd been fine. Out for pancakes as usual. then her shot. I gave her heck . Then she passed away ~ Cancer?? Not buying it.
The thing is that all deaths, ultimately, are of natural causes. It’s a weaselly meaningless phrase. If I cut off someone’s head, they’ll die of a natural cause - blood loss.
The question to be answered in any death is whether & how previous events precipitated the ‘natural cause’ in question. If this poor woman died of a heart attack, or a stroke, yes that’s a natural cause - but just shouting ‘natural cause’ is utterly irrelevant to the question of what role if any the vaccine played in precipitating that cause.
In this sense the authorities aren’t even denying the vaccine played a role - they’re just completely ignoring the question and hoping no one notices.
If this woman had died seven minutes after receiving an injection of heroin, it would be reported as a drug overdose, guaranteed. I wonder if anyone else waiting in that drugstore for their bivalent booster kept their appointment after that tragedy? A longtime friend of my wife’s announced a few days ago that she was getting one of those boosters. My wife pleaded with her not to do it. The friend replied,
“I don’t want to talk about it.” I’m still trying to understand her response; it doesn’t make sense to me other than she must be more afraid of covid than the jab.
Was she salvageable? Setting aside whether or not we should save people from their own idiocy, can we? That's a question we don't ask enough. If you're stupid enough to take the bivalent vaccine, how can anyone stop you? Would we outlaw these vaccines? Shoot people who buy & sell them? Or treat it like other "illegal" drugs? I don't mean to sound uncaring, but rather I want to ask a serious question: can these people be saved? I think you probably can't save these people. Indeed, even if you saved them from this, they'd kill themselves in some other way.
If we truly want to save these people, we need to think about what led them want these things - it's a more fundamental problem than focusing on the particular thing that killed them as the particular thing will change too quickly & too frequently for us to save them.
That coroner either is incompetent or a coward, or both.
Gosh I saw this doing the rounds and couldn’t tell if it was a fake or not. Natural causes. 7 minutes. I’ll bet $100 this would be written up as a Covid death if it happened within 7 days of infection, let alone 7 minutes.
'Does someone need to be fired?'
No not at all. Someone, and many many others, need to be put to the gallows. On live stream. At this point, none of this can be considered anything short of pre-meditated murder.
Why are they still giving this shit at drug stores? Let the doctors who push it be the ones to administer it, and let them clear away the dead bodies.
Should we test this on more than 8 mice before rolling it out to billions of people? Great question. I think if any of the people realized that was true they would hesitate to get this particular injection. They are lied to and they trust. They are wrong but they should be right.
Meanwhile most of my family, like Carol, think this is based on science and will happily line up to be injected again. Even the sister in law that just about died from a massive blood clot a week after her last booster is willing to get another. Such a sad time to live through....
This is why I suggested, that folks who have. A way to do so, please film those who are getting injected.
Get word of those like this on film out to the world....
So it can be further denied, lied about, and ignored..
Until....
Pop goes the weasel
It would be interesting to know what vaccine effect could kill in 7 minutes. Anaphylactic shock maybe? But presumably the adjuvants and lipid nanoparticles are identical to her previous shots, so why would she have a reaction to this one?
It's a shame they are trying to sweep it under the rug instead of learning from it.
Is there some point where we let people be responsible for their own choices? It's been a solid 3 years of this...if people haven't done any independent research and are still on board with all of this, I'm kindly asking, is there room for us to honor their choices and let them deal with the consequences?
Well but really, when you really get down to it, unless something manifested out of an alternate universe and took her out with some kind of unphysical death ray, it MUST be naturally caused. I mean inject somebody with poison, jab them with a stick, shoot them… Its all natural.
If she had died 5 minutes after the shot, then yes, it would have been related. But 7 minutes? Probably not related.
We had friends who were very fit and healthy and in their 30s and they went on vacation with their two children. When they returned the husband developed serious blood clots during the return flight in his legs. They asked the doctors if it was related to the vaccine and the doctor said that if the blood clots had been within two weeks of vaccination, it probably would’ve been related but because it was three weeks out, they said it wasn’t related.
They knew. We all know. This is a shameless charade.
Legally the vaccine is the cause of death. And as long as these injections are under EUA/are experimental, ANY illness/accident/death is considered vaccine related.
Basic definition of medical experimentation.
It sounds similar to the case of that unfortunate young woman in Iran who died tragically shortly after being beaten by the Iranian "morality police" for the crime of wearing a loose fitting hijab. The mullahs claim it is just a coincidence and she died of natural causes. Saskatchewan Health seems to have a similar mentality, and contempt for the intelligence of the general public. She died "coincidentally" of "natural causes" after being subjected to a novel/experimental gene therapy. How stupid does Saskatchewan Health think people are to believe that? Unfortunately, Saskatchewan Health has probably got the public figured out accurately. There are a lot of marks who believe BS very easily. Many gullible people believed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction even though even people with an intellectual disability, provided they were not also gullible, were able to correctly deduce that was a pile of stinking BS. Saskatchewan Health denies the jab killed her, even though she was dead within 7 minutes of the jab. It brings to mind Otto Von Bismarck's famous statement: "Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." Saskatchewan Health would have foreseen that death could be a result of the jab, and it appears it was. Not surprised they are engaged in a cover up. In several jurisdictions, their actions would probably give rise to suspicions of callous disregard or depraved heart murder.