MAJOR ADDITION TO THE ARTICLE: The Pfizer study was conducted at Texas Biomedical, whose director (and coauthor of the study) Deepak Kaushal admitted to faking data and falsifying and fabricating experimental methodology. Please read a section of my article discussing that.
This just keeps getting worse and worse. The immense subterfuge and decent is mind boggling. I think of the number of liars and cheats it took to accomplish this. I am astounded.
Aug 9, 2022·edited Aug 9, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Thanks Igor,
This 'science' is infuriating. Even though only my undergrad was biology, I was the biology lab director (for non-science majors) at Temple University Japan for 18 years ... constantly thinking of ways to get otherwise disinterested students to be intrinsically motivated to see science as simply a well controlled problem solving process ... just one of many tools to nourish and sustain the species. STEM fields are powerful within their domains, but insufficient by themselves to provide a meaningful quality of life.
I was troubled to see Tess Lawrie's recent Tess Talks interview with a collaborator on a new book, 'The Dark Side of Academia'. I immediately bought the Kindle version, and am seeing the same thing happening in England as is happening here in Japan. The corporate nation-state is hollowing out the humanities and social sciences from the universities. This conveniently places CEOs, politicians, and their bureaucratic functionaries as the only ones 'qualified' to make policy decisions regarding how to use the fruits of the STEM fields.
And now, 'science' as a blunt cover for perverse incentives is causing wreck and ruin throughout the world. Otherwise articulate, educated, and intelligent writers who I follow on substack are just a paper-thin headline away from wording those who have tried to abide by the scientific method as psychopathic.
It is the perverse incentives who have captured institutionalized science who are sociopathic ... more specifically, those 'dark-triad' personality types attracted to power over others ... the pathological narcissists, machiavellian opportunists, and morphologically defined psychopaths among us.
The scientific method (carefully controlled common-sense problems-solving) is now being conflated with the new religion of 'scientism' ... complete with their sanctified gate keepers and authorities.
I heard rumors of this. Considering this is the first time this kind of mRNA technology has been widely released. You would think these multigenerational studies would be absolutely paramount.
How long were the animals suppose to be kept alive for? Till the study ends? I remember them saying mice have short lifespan so we can see what happens from start to finish...
Btw it's hilarious twitter saying animal studies are safe, when that mice document Malone and co talked about got censored, later re-appeared when Pfizer started releasing new FOI documents, showing mRNA goes to spleens, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands etc, another study showed it stays for at least 2 months, while governments/media tell the world it stays in your arm for a few hours.
Frankly, I hate that the psychopaths use animals in their experiments at all. There are plenty of scientists who know very well how unnecessary it is, and not nearly as useful as it's purported to be.
With thalidomide, I believe there was one breed of rabbits in which birth defects resulted. And of course the doctor who tried to warn the world how dangerous thalidomide could be was marginalized and censored and essentially barred from having any say. Sounds familiar, huh?
I appreciate your investigating this, Igor. I have heard about all of the animals dying in the tests but haven’t had a chance to research it. Have you come across anything about the ferret tests?
Also, one of my readers mentioned that the experiments for pregnancies were performed on fewer than 50 rodents but didn’t provide a source—if you happen to have info handy about the study, I’d be curious to learn more details. (No worries if not as I can research it myself when I have time.)
On an unrelated note, I just launched my new interview series and would love to interview you for a future entry (email me if you’re up for it). I’m backlogged so no rush, just planting the seed.
Of course it’s suspicious but in my experience and observations everything they do is suspicious when it comes to adverse events to their products. Health regulatory systems also appear purposely designed to hide adverse events to pharmaceutical products. From being trained wrong things on purpose in medical school to the legislation designed to put the fear of god into any dr considering blaming a pharmaceutical product for injury.
The whole health and regulatory system is corrupt and appears designed to be psychologically damaging to drs and patients alike.
i recall dr. richard fleming stating early on, that all animals died on clinical trials of mRNA testing with few weeks. in human lifes that translates in 2-3 years.
fact checkers are mostly journalists ... basically hired guns.
In December 2020, a variety of regulatory documents Pfizer had submitted to Europe's FDA (the EMA) were leaked and provided a lot of insights into how the Covid vaccines were developed an approved (many of the EMA documents were most likely identical to what was sent to the FDA). Since I have previous experience in drug development and investigational new drug applications (including for COVID-19 therapeutics) I made it a point to download all the documents when they were first posted on an anonymous message board and read through everything that was within them. The key takeaway I got from these documents was that a lot of tests that would normally always be required were waived, and since all of the tasks that were waived were also the ones that were evaluate for specific issues of greatest concern with the mRNA vaccine, I correctly predicted that major issues with subsequently be discovered in this regard (since in reality this almost certainly meant that the tests have been done and Pfizer concluded the data was so bad it was better to pretend they never did the tests).
Additionally, the animal tests were very lackluster and had a variety of issues that normally would have prevented a drug application from being approved for human testing. There were also a variety of other major issues with the Application and concerns voiced by regulators (such as the vaccine not covering variance that were already common in late 2020 or the mRNA degrading and producing potentially concerning proteins). Overall, the thing I found the most frustrating about reading through the regulators comments on Pfizer's application was that my team and other teams I corresponded with or how to infinitely higher standard by the FDA for an appropriate drug application, despite the fact our approaches were not novel and had decades of data showing safety.
That all being said, those EMA documents are really valuable for people who want to understand more of the story that you were discussing, and if you cannot find them online, I can direct you to them.
The difference between 'to the letter of the law' and 'to the intent of the law'. I have a really really hard time with the use of animals for testing, (even humans!) and the injection of the poor animals with our effed up poisons. The way these injections kill is with much pain, as poisonings typically cause. Perverted.
HA! Thanks. I saw that giant headline as well. I assumed some big story was about to break on the animals and they wanted to get ahead of it. I guessed wrong as Nobody but yourself is writing about it.
MAJOR ADDITION TO THE ARTICLE: The Pfizer study was conducted at Texas Biomedical, whose director (and coauthor of the study) Deepak Kaushal admitted to faking data and falsifying and fabricating experimental methodology. Please read a section of my article discussing that.
This just keeps getting worse and worse. The immense subterfuge and decent is mind boggling. I think of the number of liars and cheats it took to accomplish this. I am astounded.
Thank you Igor for noticing the simple truths that others seem to miss for some strange reason!
Thank you sincerely.
Thanks Igor,
This 'science' is infuriating. Even though only my undergrad was biology, I was the biology lab director (for non-science majors) at Temple University Japan for 18 years ... constantly thinking of ways to get otherwise disinterested students to be intrinsically motivated to see science as simply a well controlled problem solving process ... just one of many tools to nourish and sustain the species. STEM fields are powerful within their domains, but insufficient by themselves to provide a meaningful quality of life.
I was troubled to see Tess Lawrie's recent Tess Talks interview with a collaborator on a new book, 'The Dark Side of Academia'. I immediately bought the Kindle version, and am seeing the same thing happening in England as is happening here in Japan. The corporate nation-state is hollowing out the humanities and social sciences from the universities. This conveniently places CEOs, politicians, and their bureaucratic functionaries as the only ones 'qualified' to make policy decisions regarding how to use the fruits of the STEM fields.
https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/fKWshCTwos6Cc0TyPEY9EO/Japan-dumbs-down-its-universities.html
And now, 'science' as a blunt cover for perverse incentives is causing wreck and ruin throughout the world. Otherwise articulate, educated, and intelligent writers who I follow on substack are just a paper-thin headline away from wording those who have tried to abide by the scientific method as psychopathic.
It is the perverse incentives who have captured institutionalized science who are sociopathic ... more specifically, those 'dark-triad' personality types attracted to power over others ... the pathological narcissists, machiavellian opportunists, and morphologically defined psychopaths among us.
The scientific method (carefully controlled common-sense problems-solving) is now being conflated with the new religion of 'scientism' ... complete with their sanctified gate keepers and authorities.
Great detective work, as always, Igor. I thank you for your diligence.
May God bless you and your family...and keep you safe from what's coming.
Trust the New and Improved Scientific Method... brought to you by Gates and his mobbed up agencies
I heard rumors of this. Considering this is the first time this kind of mRNA technology has been widely released. You would think these multigenerational studies would be absolutely paramount.
Apparently not.
How long were the animals suppose to be kept alive for? Till the study ends? I remember them saying mice have short lifespan so we can see what happens from start to finish...
Btw it's hilarious twitter saying animal studies are safe, when that mice document Malone and co talked about got censored, later re-appeared when Pfizer started releasing new FOI documents, showing mRNA goes to spleens, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands etc, another study showed it stays for at least 2 months, while governments/media tell the world it stays in your arm for a few hours.
Fraud
Frankly, I hate that the psychopaths use animals in their experiments at all. There are plenty of scientists who know very well how unnecessary it is, and not nearly as useful as it's purported to be.
With thalidomide, I believe there was one breed of rabbits in which birth defects resulted. And of course the doctor who tried to warn the world how dangerous thalidomide could be was marginalized and censored and essentially barred from having any say. Sounds familiar, huh?
I appreciate your investigating this, Igor. I have heard about all of the animals dying in the tests but haven’t had a chance to research it. Have you come across anything about the ferret tests?
Also, one of my readers mentioned that the experiments for pregnancies were performed on fewer than 50 rodents but didn’t provide a source—if you happen to have info handy about the study, I’d be curious to learn more details. (No worries if not as I can research it myself when I have time.)
On an unrelated note, I just launched my new interview series and would love to interview you for a future entry (email me if you’re up for it). I’m backlogged so no rush, just planting the seed.
CJ Hopkins and I had a blast with the first one:
• “Dissident Dialogues: CJ Hopkins” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-cj-hopkins)
Primates, like Macaques, are typically reused for multiple studies over time. It seems rather unusual to necropsy them all for a vaccines study.
Of course it’s suspicious but in my experience and observations everything they do is suspicious when it comes to adverse events to their products. Health regulatory systems also appear purposely designed to hide adverse events to pharmaceutical products. From being trained wrong things on purpose in medical school to the legislation designed to put the fear of god into any dr considering blaming a pharmaceutical product for injury.
The whole health and regulatory system is corrupt and appears designed to be psychologically damaging to drs and patients alike.
i recall dr. richard fleming stating early on, that all animals died on clinical trials of mRNA testing with few weeks. in human lifes that translates in 2-3 years.
fact checkers are mostly journalists ... basically hired guns.
In December 2020, a variety of regulatory documents Pfizer had submitted to Europe's FDA (the EMA) were leaked and provided a lot of insights into how the Covid vaccines were developed an approved (many of the EMA documents were most likely identical to what was sent to the FDA). Since I have previous experience in drug development and investigational new drug applications (including for COVID-19 therapeutics) I made it a point to download all the documents when they were first posted on an anonymous message board and read through everything that was within them. The key takeaway I got from these documents was that a lot of tests that would normally always be required were waived, and since all of the tasks that were waived were also the ones that were evaluate for specific issues of greatest concern with the mRNA vaccine, I correctly predicted that major issues with subsequently be discovered in this regard (since in reality this almost certainly meant that the tests have been done and Pfizer concluded the data was so bad it was better to pretend they never did the tests).
Additionally, the animal tests were very lackluster and had a variety of issues that normally would have prevented a drug application from being approved for human testing. There were also a variety of other major issues with the Application and concerns voiced by regulators (such as the vaccine not covering variance that were already common in late 2020 or the mRNA degrading and producing potentially concerning proteins). Overall, the thing I found the most frustrating about reading through the regulators comments on Pfizer's application was that my team and other teams I corresponded with or how to infinitely higher standard by the FDA for an appropriate drug application, despite the fact our approaches were not novel and had decades of data showing safety.
That all being said, those EMA documents are really valuable for people who want to understand more of the story that you were discussing, and if you cannot find them online, I can direct you to them.
The difference between 'to the letter of the law' and 'to the intent of the law'. I have a really really hard time with the use of animals for testing, (even humans!) and the injection of the poor animals with our effed up poisons. The way these injections kill is with much pain, as poisonings typically cause. Perverted.
HA! Thanks. I saw that giant headline as well. I assumed some big story was about to break on the animals and they wanted to get ahead of it. I guessed wrong as Nobody but yourself is writing about it.