Stop boosting everyone! Old people are the most at risk for harm because their immune systems already suck. The jab only makes immunity worse. Just because it's more obvious there's a problem when younger people die after jab doesn't mean the jab isn't also killing older people. It is absolutely killing old people. Their lives are worthwhile too. So, stop jabbing and boosting EVERYONE!
As you might know, our (adolescent) Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau decided to go on public television recently to give -- what many perceive -- as a threat to citizens, explaining that if a ridiculously high % of people get their boosters (80-90%, if I remember correctly), there won’t be need for restrictions. His health minister compared the immune system to a cell phone that needs to be recharged. What planet are these politicians living on? While even the worst countries (NZ and Australia) in terms of c19 measures & restrictions have woken up, Canada is doubling down. Hopefully people will not comply.
I'm over 50 (living in the USA) and there's no circumstance where I want that poison. I had the bug and got over it like any other cold/flu. No big deal. Certainly not worth the risks of the experimental poison. Funny how the narrative is now talking about "offer", "offering", "offered". Just an offering not like it was presented as a life-destroying mandate or anything like that. No, just a suggestion and an opportunity. 🙄
"The purpose of vaccination is NOT to prevent infection with COVID-19..."
The entire justification for giving these to people who were never at risk from covid was to "protect others" by stopping the spread.
So what this statement really means is "we are stopping vaccination because this product does not stop infection or spread, unlike all other vaccines."
Well, the notice does recommend that relatives of ‘at risk’ people get the vaccine. So the Danish authorities are clearly still - oddly, given the evidence otherwise- working on the basis that the vaccines prevent infection and/or transmission.
In "Who will be offered vaccination against covid-19?", I note the following: "In addition, we recommend that relatives of persons at particularly higher risk accept the offer of vaccination TO PROTECT THEIR RELATIVES WHO ARE AT PARTICULARLY HIGHER RISK."
Thus, the idea that getting vaccinated prevents you from spreading the disease to your at-risk relatives is still not completely dead.
I always felt that all the scandanavian countries knew the scam from day one. But, historically they are nations of six million or less surrounded by Germany, Russia, and now primarily the USA.
They know they have to do what is politically viable. They know the US military/industrial complex function as one unit, and open non compliance usually means a group of commandos do regime change-recently in Haiti, and Burundi, and historically a long list of Latin American countries, the Phillipines, etc. There is really only one country that has that kind of military, and it is the USA. In addition if any other third party nation attempted regime change, they know they would be bombed into smithereens by…the USA. So Scandanavia followed what they knew to be baloney to
try to get this finished. Now they are changing because CDC has signaled the direction, and possibly because they see that if they keep vaccinating rather than their already low populations will be down to…?
Good post, thanks. We have identified so many inconsistencies and lies we get lost in them. Thankfully there are those who can keep a clear head and continue to identify them.
Sounds like somebody’s been doing homework on all cause mortality and/or getting ready for litigation.
Stop boosting everyone! Old people are the most at risk for harm because their immune systems already suck. The jab only makes immunity worse. Just because it's more obvious there's a problem when younger people die after jab doesn't mean the jab isn't also killing older people. It is absolutely killing old people. Their lives are worthwhile too. So, stop jabbing and boosting EVERYONE!
As you might know, our (adolescent) Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau decided to go on public television recently to give -- what many perceive -- as a threat to citizens, explaining that if a ridiculously high % of people get their boosters (80-90%, if I remember correctly), there won’t be need for restrictions. His health minister compared the immune system to a cell phone that needs to be recharged. What planet are these politicians living on? While even the worst countries (NZ and Australia) in terms of c19 measures & restrictions have woken up, Canada is doubling down. Hopefully people will not comply.
It's the same in the UK...for now.
I guess they are back to the original plan of killing just old people
I, for one, don't have a gnat memory. I remember the scare. I remember them telling us it would STOP covid in its tracks.
No amount of lying (NOW) can redress their intentional harm shots.
They all need to hang.
I'm over 50 (living in the USA) and there's no circumstance where I want that poison. I had the bug and got over it like any other cold/flu. No big deal. Certainly not worth the risks of the experimental poison. Funny how the narrative is now talking about "offer", "offering", "offered". Just an offering not like it was presented as a life-destroying mandate or anything like that. No, just a suggestion and an opportunity. 🙄
"The purpose of vaccination is NOT to prevent infection with COVID-19..."
The entire justification for giving these to people who were never at risk from covid was to "protect others" by stopping the spread.
So what this statement really means is "we are stopping vaccination because this product does not stop infection or spread, unlike all other vaccines."
Well, the notice does recommend that relatives of ‘at risk’ people get the vaccine. So the Danish authorities are clearly still - oddly, given the evidence otherwise- working on the basis that the vaccines prevent infection and/or transmission.
Igor - thank you for your articles! Blessings to you & yours
I think we would all say that the information that we are already familiar with is more than enough to drive this decision.
In "Who will be offered vaccination against covid-19?", I note the following: "In addition, we recommend that relatives of persons at particularly higher risk accept the offer of vaccination TO PROTECT THEIR RELATIVES WHO ARE AT PARTICULARLY HIGHER RISK."
Thus, the idea that getting vaccinated prevents you from spreading the disease to your at-risk relatives is still not completely dead.
I always felt that all the scandanavian countries knew the scam from day one. But, historically they are nations of six million or less surrounded by Germany, Russia, and now primarily the USA.
They know they have to do what is politically viable. They know the US military/industrial complex function as one unit, and open non compliance usually means a group of commandos do regime change-recently in Haiti, and Burundi, and historically a long list of Latin American countries, the Phillipines, etc. There is really only one country that has that kind of military, and it is the USA. In addition if any other third party nation attempted regime change, they know they would be bombed into smithereens by…the USA. So Scandanavia followed what they knew to be baloney to
try to get this finished. Now they are changing because CDC has signaled the direction, and possibly because they see that if they keep vaccinating rather than their already low populations will be down to…?
Good post, thanks. We have identified so many inconsistencies and lies we get lost in them. Thankfully there are those who can keep a clear head and continue to identify them.
The Danish health authority have accepted the truth. This is the way to have sensible policy without admitting mistakes.
this higher risk thing seems to be backwards, unless you are trying to kill these groups off