But still somehow this will be the fault of the unvaccinated for their failure to get onboard the Titanic (I mean life boat) for the good of the community (I mean drug companies).
It is a hard wind driven rainstorm. You (the jabbed) are carrying an umbrella. Me (the unjabbed pure blood with natural immunity) only have a short run to my car and park in a garage at home, so I am only wearing a raincoat. You obviously get soaking wet while outside waiting for your bus, while I am only slightly damp when I get home. But you blame me for not carrying an umbrella as the reason you got wet.
What I'm seeing where I live is worse than vaccine failure, actually. Lots of boosted people catching covid right now and suffering worse symptoms than expected from omicron. Not mild. Is my sample skewed (I live in an area with high vax uptake) or are the vaccinated faring even worse than the data suggests?
Your interpretation of figure 7 is incorrect. This is understandable as it is a confusing graph that shouldn't have been approved (but I would say that as I misinterpreted it the same way at first). Anyway, the only booster data point is the one on the right of each graph -- the others are for two doses of vaccine.
Of course, your general interpretation of what is going on is correct -- the vaccines are performing spectacularly badly and are almost certainly responsible for the very high case numbers seen for Omicron in the west (that's what you get when you've got negative vaccine effectiveness). They're a disaster but governments have to keep up the pretence because the masses will be rather cross when they find out they've been duped.
Why is the conclusion more of the same? “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations”
short duration "protection" is what darpa intended in the 2013 project with moderna. whay they did not get was safety and responsiveness to new pathogens so the tech went on the shelf until pfizer found the profitability key.
And that's still *relative* risk reduction. Max Absolute Risk Reduction is 1.3% for any of the experimental drugs, according to published documentation.
Yet, I just read that they are mandating vaccines for everyone in Ecuador (over the age of 5, I think)...are governments this willfully blind or just all being controlled by Pfizer et al?
¡No problemo! Schedule the 4th jab 4 months after the 3rd and enjoy your iron-clad vaxx protection again. Rinse and repeat. Then after3, 2, and 1 month. Altogether 10 more months of this nonsense is baked in. Incidentally, that takes us into 7 busters - a nice occult number all by itself. Go into your bunker and come out then - the world will look drastically different then.
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov
Igor, when you say “protection” am I correct in assuming that you are referring only to the vaccine’s efficacy in preventing infection?
In the new NYT article about Israel considering a 4th dose it states “There was no clear indication of reduced efficacy against severe illness.” So have the original 2 doses have not waned in efficacy? That’s what Fauci was saying when they started selling the public on boosters. Plus the vaccine trials did not even assess their ability to prevent infection!
Me thinks they have purposefully muddied the waters in regards to the world “protection” by using it to mean both protection against infection and protection against severe disease so that you never know quite what they are referring to. In regards to boosters it’s as if they want people to think they are talking about the ability to prevent severe illness and death when in reality they are talking about their ability to prevent infection. If your vaccinated and the vaccine works and your not in an extremely high risk group why would you care about getting infected???
I'm a bit put-off by the fact that Denmark study's VE calculations are adjusted (age, sex, etc) and relevant person-days and infection counts for unvaccinated not given. Also weird that VE against Delta is still higher than 0 in the 91+ group, for example. I think they must have gotten some of the math wrong with the rapidly shifting denominator due to rampant "boosting" in Denmark; trying to figure out how the vax works in the middle of a booster-frenzy is not a good idea in general.
I still don't get how it makes sense to eventually kill or disable every single person. I guess it just wont make sense, but seems to be what is wanted.
But still somehow this will be the fault of the unvaccinated for their failure to get onboard the Titanic (I mean life boat) for the good of the community (I mean drug companies).
I use an umbrella analogy.
It is a hard wind driven rainstorm. You (the jabbed) are carrying an umbrella. Me (the unjabbed pure blood with natural immunity) only have a short run to my car and park in a garage at home, so I am only wearing a raincoat. You obviously get soaking wet while outside waiting for your bus, while I am only slightly damp when I get home. But you blame me for not carrying an umbrella as the reason you got wet.
The stupidity is astounding.
Your life jacket analogy made me think of these hilarious (and lunacy-exposing) videos by JP:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GukIoZ8d3Ew&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omrVpA14FpY
Clearly the vaccines are 100% effective.
They will clear the population of the most gullible and stupid amongst us, and their offspring
Safe for big pharma
Effective against sheep
So the leaders are telling People to get booster shots during a wave in COVID cases will make them highly vulnerable just at the wrong time.
Categorize under:
“Never vaccinate during a pandemic. It only makes things worse…”
What I'm seeing where I live is worse than vaccine failure, actually. Lots of boosted people catching covid right now and suffering worse symptoms than expected from omicron. Not mild. Is my sample skewed (I live in an area with high vax uptake) or are the vaccinated faring even worse than the data suggests?
Your interpretation of figure 7 is incorrect. This is understandable as it is a confusing graph that shouldn't have been approved (but I would say that as I misinterpreted it the same way at first). Anyway, the only booster data point is the one on the right of each graph -- the others are for two doses of vaccine.
Of course, your general interpretation of what is going on is correct -- the vaccines are performing spectacularly badly and are almost certainly responsible for the very high case numbers seen for Omicron in the west (that's what you get when you've got negative vaccine effectiveness). They're a disaster but governments have to keep up the pretence because the masses will be rather cross when they find out they've been duped.
Why is the conclusion more of the same? “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations”
short duration "protection" is what darpa intended in the 2013 project with moderna. whay they did not get was safety and responsiveness to new pathogens so the tech went on the shelf until pfizer found the profitability key.
And that's still *relative* risk reduction. Max Absolute Risk Reduction is 1.3% for any of the experimental drugs, according to published documentation.
Yet, I just read that they are mandating vaccines for everyone in Ecuador (over the age of 5, I think)...are governments this willfully blind or just all being controlled by Pfizer et al?
¡No problemo! Schedule the 4th jab 4 months after the 3rd and enjoy your iron-clad vaxx protection again. Rinse and repeat. Then after3, 2, and 1 month. Altogether 10 more months of this nonsense is baked in. Incidentally, that takes us into 7 busters - a nice occult number all by itself. Go into your bunker and come out then - the world will look drastically different then.
Igor, when you say “protection” am I correct in assuming that you are referring only to the vaccine’s efficacy in preventing infection?
In the new NYT article about Israel considering a 4th dose it states “There was no clear indication of reduced efficacy against severe illness.” So have the original 2 doses have not waned in efficacy? That’s what Fauci was saying when they started selling the public on boosters. Plus the vaccine trials did not even assess their ability to prevent infection!
Me thinks they have purposefully muddied the waters in regards to the world “protection” by using it to mean both protection against infection and protection against severe disease so that you never know quite what they are referring to. In regards to boosters it’s as if they want people to think they are talking about the ability to prevent severe illness and death when in reality they are talking about their ability to prevent infection. If your vaccinated and the vaccine works and your not in an extremely high risk group why would you care about getting infected???
IT'S BEGINNING TO LOOK A LOT LIKE....https://www.bitchute.com/video/WYkohcm9VRfv/
I'm a bit put-off by the fact that Denmark study's VE calculations are adjusted (age, sex, etc) and relevant person-days and infection counts for unvaccinated not given. Also weird that VE against Delta is still higher than 0 in the 91+ group, for example. I think they must have gotten some of the math wrong with the rapidly shifting denominator due to rampant "boosting" in Denmark; trying to figure out how the vax works in the middle of a booster-frenzy is not a good idea in general.
I still don't get how it makes sense to eventually kill or disable every single person. I guess it just wont make sense, but seems to be what is wanted.