539 Comments
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

trump was wrong deciding on mRNA technology over regular vaccines.

operation warpspeed will be regarded as the worst decision in human history.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgghhhhhhhhh!!! Revising/removing the the developmental milestones criteria for babies/children, says premeditation.

There are NO WHERE NEAR ENOUGH babies born in the last few years that they actually have data on, to be able to completely throw decade's worth of research and considered guidelines.

It's "here something we prepared earlier".

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Nope. No small thing, this is an end to the reign of vaccines, and this isn't even a vaccine, silver lining.

Expand full comment

Hi Igor, I wanted to quote you three things from things I have written that are directly relevant to this.

#3

(From a Good friend I have known for the last 12 years)-My friend is a 30 year old female with no medical issues besides some musculoskeletal issues. She is a very pro-vaccine and received the J&J vaccine when she was 2 months pregnant. Immediately after she received the vaccine, she became acutely ill and developed hives. Later in her pregnancy, she received a prenatal ultrasound that showed her baby only had 1 kidney. As the kidneys form between 5 weeks to 12 weeks of gestation, there is a distinct possibly the J&J vaccine was teratogenic (especially given that the renal vasculature appears to be one of the tissues the spike proteins target as it has ACE2 receptors and so forth).

This was within my log of the 100+ people I knew who had severe vaccine injuries or died.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

"For those of my readers who are parents, do you think that crawling is unimportant as a milestone?"

It is unimportant to them because they're not doing this for the children. If milestones are eliminated or delayed then data and studies can be massaged without revealing the COST.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Hi Igor, great work! I really appreciated your interview The Highwire, too!

These criminals need to be locked up. If you want to read about racketeering and fraud in Big Pharma, this is a good place to look:

https://www.corp-research.org/pfizer

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

what if chronically sick mom takes molnupravir while nursing? these poor kids don't have a prayer.

a confounder here with the data on developmental disorders may be the lockdowns. language development is way down from 2019 and we started to see that in 2020.

Expand full comment

This has been my exact point. The "vaccines" are 100% once injected. You can't undo it. You can do things to mitigate succumbing to a Covid infection. Plus you're injecting a toxic product that doesn't work with what is apparently negative efficacy. How malicious is this? Never seen anything like this in my lifetime and I turn 76 this year.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Igor, I just watched you on the Highwire - great interview. It was good to see you being praised by Del for your outstanding article and substack.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This is premeditated. They know what is coming and so they are literally fiddling the figures in advance, by moving the goal posts.

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Folks are more picky about the kind of milk in their latte than what is injected into their body. Priorities inverted.

Expand full comment

Hi Igor, I wanted to quote you three things from things I have written that are directly relevant to this.

#2

-There are a variety of significant physical and psychological harms that arose from masking. Overall, the most problematic issue I’ve identified came from researchers who had monitored children for years identifying a drop from 100 to 78 in the average IQ of children born during the pandemic (which was most likely due to social isolation and facial expressions concealed through masking).

To quantify the impact of a 22-point drop: “An IQ of 70-85 is the threshold for borderline intellectual functioning and is technically a cognitive impairment, but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability and this group may hence not be sufficiently mentally disabled to be eligible for specialized services. During school years, these individuals are often "slow learners" and a large percentage of this group fails to complete high school. As a result, many can often achieve only a low socioeconomic status, and most adults in this group blend in with the rest of the population.”

While there were many systemic failings to the pandemic response I have come to terms with, it still is difficult for me to believe almost no one realized the alterations in childhood intellectual development was a critical red flag with profound consequences for the lower classes. This problem is particularly insidious because the researchers discovered the IQ drop disproportionately affected those of a lower socioeconomic class (presumably because they lacked the resources to mitigate the effect of the pandemic on their child rearing).

(this is from a draft I have that I have not yet published)

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

The blatant genocide of our perfect newborns, who are so pure, so full of divine light, so clear, with chakras and channels wide open; are also so vulnerable, and totally dependent on humans who are trustworthy, caring and educated.

Sadly, as much as I dislike being pessimistic about their future, The humans in charge of these perfect little beings are so, so sick with ignorance, greed and evil, I grieve and cringe when I sense the horrific doom these precious beings could encounter!

What will become of humanity? Divine perfect beings turned into mechanical robot trans-human vegetables. The betrayal that perpetrates civilization at this time will be weighed over and over again, each and everyday as we each observe all of the many people we know and hear about, who have fallen into the pit of medical tyranny. Love to All Humanity. Love to All of You.

Expand full comment

Hi Igor, I wanted to quote you three things from things I have written that are directly relevant to this.

#1.

It is also possible the vaccines have dramatically increased individual susceptibility to COVID, as discussed in this recent article, which shows this effect of mass vaccination was abundantly clear from the existing science on the mRNA vaccines before they entered the market. However, even if increasing long haul COVID is the accounting for the rise in disability, that still means the increase in disability is ultimately due to the vaccines as they increased the likelihood of long haul Covid occurring within the population.

To further muddy the picture, it appears that a large number of vaccine injuries are being erroneously classified as “long haul COVID.” It is extremely common in the unfalsifiable belief structure of Western Medicine to classify an injury from a medication as actually being due to a deficiency of that medication. One of the best (and sadly very common) examples discussed within this article is that the psychiatric disorders frequently caused by antidepressants are interpreted as these medications protecting you from pre-existing mental illness, leading to more being given and catastrophic complications arising.

The symptoms of long haul Covid and Covid vaccine injuries have a significant overlap and respond to similar treatments. To this point, the NIH was fully aware of this by early 2021, as they were using the same scale used to evaluate long haul Covid to evaluate vaccine injuries, which the NIH then classified as vaccine injuries in their scientific publication on the injuries.

Given the enormous political pressure to have a way to dismiss these injuries and continue incentivizing widespread vaccination, it is reasonable to assume this erroneous classification like than employed by the antidepressant injuries would be the default solution. The overlap in the symptoms between these two conditions make it very easy to trick gullible people.

To that point, I and others have seen countless cases of individuals both online and in person reporting classic descriptions of vaccine injuries, admitting they have been repeatedly vaccinated, and citing their horrific experience with long-haul Covid as a reason why it is crucial for everyone to be vaccinated. Similarly, I have seen cases of doctors labeling vaccine injuries as “long haul covid following vaccination” in order to have a politically acceptable way to get recognition for their patient’s vaccine injuries.

(this was from the more detail followup/analysis in the disability data I just wrote: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/all-evidence-suggests-the-covid-vaccines?s=w)

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This logic of giving repeated exposures/doses was one that first got me angry and concerned about these mandates and jabs.

If in the future we can prove the spike protein is genotoxic with certainty. Then consider the risk of this frequent exposure.

Three things really matter when dealing with mutagens or genotoxic substances and deciphering how much damage they will create.

1) The concentration or strength of the exposure to spike protein/mutagen. Eg are there heaps of spike present or only a small amount.

2)Time of exposure to the spike. Eg is it present for just a few days, weeks or months.

3)Frequency of exposures to the spike. Eg one viral infection versus three or four inoculations. Or in this case as Igor says. Minimum of 6x expsorues without accounting for any natural infections that also may occur. That when considered is a lot of exposure!

How can anyone argue this is safer?

Expand full comment
Jun 11, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Igor, this is very interesting. I pulled up the study and read it. I do wonder how many of those women were in fact jabbed. Half of them? All of them? I'd be more interested in seeing a study of neuro outcomes of unjabbed women who test positive versus jabbed who test positive. How about the women who got covid prior to pregnancy, had antibodies confirmed via blood test (my situation) and perhaps contract an extremely mild case of covid again during pregnancy, assuming any of those home tests are remotely accurate? None of this will, of course, ever be looked into.

Expand full comment