Igor Thank you for all the effort, skill, knowledge, attention to detail you put into every single article you publish. Your thinking & consistency in adhering to the principles of critical thinking as well as clarity in which you present and approach the themes you cover is exemplary. Your work is perfect in so many ways and should be used to teach critical thinking & Big Data Analysis in schools and/or on the job learning. Public Service in Australia, every policy department is lacking adequate Data Analysis skills. Thank you for the outstanding articles that are well researched, analysed, presented, easy to understand and accessible.
There were multiple mouse-adapted (gain of function) studies, not just MA10. All of them used either pre-B.1.1 isolates or in the UNC case, a house-grown clone of the Wuhan strain, and none of them "reproduced" the B.1 mutation signature (including D614G). That includes MA / MA10 (the latter is the subject of the patent, see the mutation list in Fig 1 of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510428/ - no D614G).
So if Omicron (BA.1 / BA.2) has the B.1 mutation signature, it didn't come from any published mouse study. This was extensively considered in my own review of the evidence. It had to be from a non-published lab "experiment" (i.e. intentional gain of function using a B.1 template) https://unglossed.substack.com/p/omicron-origins-part-2
Baric mentioned to an interviewer not too long ago that anything developed in his labs has a unique genetic signature added. It sure would be good to know what that is.
time to reign in the egos in science, who are only interested in stroking their egos with Frankenstein experiments with all humans paying Billions in costs and millions loses their lives
Mar 30, 2022·edited Mar 30, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
I red this post and spent time on reading the transcriptions but it looks that Baric the serial killer or just the criminal gang hand, started in 1999 to play with bio weapons, and it looks that David Martin 9 months ago got all the dots together thanks to his corporate knowledge and data. He's not a biologist or a virus expert but he follows the money...
Also, what adds another dimension to your articles is that you do make a Point. You create Meaning. Anything can be analysed into the oblivion without any meaningful purpose/outcome. The way you scope your articles is meaningful. It empowers the understanding in ways that matter, not just for the individuals reading them but to the society & scientific community as well.
Let me get this straight. Without question, they've continued gain-of-function research on covid even during the pandemic and have likely produced a 'contagious vaccine'. I'm neither ' skilled in the art' or have the time at the moment to delve deeper, but this paper lists which persons did what...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510428/
"S.R.L. and K.H.D. designed and conducted in vitro and animal experiments, analyzed data, generated figures, and wrote the manuscript. A.S. conducted in vitro and animal experiments and edited the manuscript. L.V.T. conducted in vitro experiments and neutralization assays and analyzed data. C.E.E. generated VRP vaccine and conducted in vitro experiments. K.O. conducted in vitro experiments and imaged and analyzed data. Y.J.H. and E.J.F. conducted in vitro experiments. W.S. performed and analyzed sequencing. S.A.M. imaged and analyzed histology. A.W., K.L.G., and A.J.B. assisted with animal experiments. T.S. assisted with in vitro experiments. T.P.S. wrote manuscript. L.E.G. conducted animal experiments and edited manuscript. N.J.M. analyzed data. R.C.B. analyzed data and edited the manuscript. R.S.B. supervised the project, assisted in experimental design, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript." Each of these persons, full names at the top of the article, need to be approached for comment.
And the funding, including NIH and NAID..."This project was supported by the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with funding from the North Carolina Coronavirus Relief Fund established and appropriated by the North Carolina General Assembly. Animal histopathology service was performed by Dawud Hilliard, Lily Wai, Ling Wang, and Mia Evangelista in the Animal Histopathology and Laboratory Medicine Core at the University of North Carolina, which is supported in part by an NCI Center Core Support Grant (5P30CA016086-41) to the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. This project was funded in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services award 1U19 AI142759 (Antiviral Drug Discovery and Development Center awarded to R.S.B), 5R01AI132178 (partnership grant awarded to T.P.S. and R.S.B), AI100625, and AI108197 to R.S.B. as well as an animal models contract from the NIH (HHSN272201700036I 75N93020F00001) and U54CA260543 sponsored by NCI. K.H.D. was funded by T32AI142759."
NOT TRUE! "any such murine SARS-Cov-2 work done legally ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, would need to have UNC’s permission due to patent protection". US patent protection only applies in the US. A researcher in Ukraine, Canada, China, or anywhere else could practice their evil free of any constraints. The US patent only applies if they attempted to produce, sell or use their virus in the United States.
Igor Thank you for all the effort, skill, knowledge, attention to detail you put into every single article you publish. Your thinking & consistency in adhering to the principles of critical thinking as well as clarity in which you present and approach the themes you cover is exemplary. Your work is perfect in so many ways and should be used to teach critical thinking & Big Data Analysis in schools and/or on the job learning. Public Service in Australia, every policy department is lacking adequate Data Analysis skills. Thank you for the outstanding articles that are well researched, analysed, presented, easy to understand and accessible.
There were multiple mouse-adapted (gain of function) studies, not just MA10. All of them used either pre-B.1.1 isolates or in the UNC case, a house-grown clone of the Wuhan strain, and none of them "reproduced" the B.1 mutation signature (including D614G). That includes MA / MA10 (the latter is the subject of the patent, see the mutation list in Fig 1 of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510428/ - no D614G).
So if Omicron (BA.1 / BA.2) has the B.1 mutation signature, it didn't come from any published mouse study. This was extensively considered in my own review of the evidence. It had to be from a non-published lab "experiment" (i.e. intentional gain of function using a B.1 template) https://unglossed.substack.com/p/omicron-origins-part-2
Baric mentioned to an interviewer not too long ago that anything developed in his labs has a unique genetic signature added. It sure would be good to know what that is.
time to reign in the egos in science, who are only interested in stroking their egos with Frankenstein experiments with all humans paying Billions in costs and millions loses their lives
I red this post and spent time on reading the transcriptions but it looks that Baric the serial killer or just the criminal gang hand, started in 1999 to play with bio weapons, and it looks that David Martin 9 months ago got all the dots together thanks to his corporate knowledge and data. He's not a biologist or a virus expert but he follows the money...
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/it-didnt-just-pop-of-the-wuhan-lab
Baric is as dirty as Fauci, Gates, Soros, Klaus, Yuval ,Wyss on and on
“The best laid schemes o' Mice an' Men,
Gang aft agley.
An' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain,
For promis'd joy!
― Robert Burns, Collected Poems of Robert Burns
Also, what adds another dimension to your articles is that you do make a Point. You create Meaning. Anything can be analysed into the oblivion without any meaningful purpose/outcome. The way you scope your articles is meaningful. It empowers the understanding in ways that matter, not just for the individuals reading them but to the society & scientific community as well.
Apparently the Intelligence State Ruling America already started WWIII…
…first major attack was a bioweapon
“Now listen, we need to be quiet as mice. No, quieter than that. As quiet as . . . as . . .”
“Dead mice?” Reynie suggested.
“Perfect,” said Kate with an approving nod. “As quiet as dead mice.”
― Trenton Lee Stewart, The Mysterious Benedict Society and the Prisoner's Dilemma
Why is this man not in prison let alone still doing GOF experiments in a lab?
Let me get this straight. Without question, they've continued gain-of-function research on covid even during the pandemic and have likely produced a 'contagious vaccine'. I'm neither ' skilled in the art' or have the time at the moment to delve deeper, but this paper lists which persons did what...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510428/
"S.R.L. and K.H.D. designed and conducted in vitro and animal experiments, analyzed data, generated figures, and wrote the manuscript. A.S. conducted in vitro and animal experiments and edited the manuscript. L.V.T. conducted in vitro experiments and neutralization assays and analyzed data. C.E.E. generated VRP vaccine and conducted in vitro experiments. K.O. conducted in vitro experiments and imaged and analyzed data. Y.J.H. and E.J.F. conducted in vitro experiments. W.S. performed and analyzed sequencing. S.A.M. imaged and analyzed histology. A.W., K.L.G., and A.J.B. assisted with animal experiments. T.S. assisted with in vitro experiments. T.P.S. wrote manuscript. L.E.G. conducted animal experiments and edited manuscript. N.J.M. analyzed data. R.C.B. analyzed data and edited the manuscript. R.S.B. supervised the project, assisted in experimental design, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript." Each of these persons, full names at the top of the article, need to be approached for comment.
And the funding, including NIH and NAID..."This project was supported by the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with funding from the North Carolina Coronavirus Relief Fund established and appropriated by the North Carolina General Assembly. Animal histopathology service was performed by Dawud Hilliard, Lily Wai, Ling Wang, and Mia Evangelista in the Animal Histopathology and Laboratory Medicine Core at the University of North Carolina, which is supported in part by an NCI Center Core Support Grant (5P30CA016086-41) to the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. This project was funded in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services award 1U19 AI142759 (Antiviral Drug Discovery and Development Center awarded to R.S.B), 5R01AI132178 (partnership grant awarded to T.P.S. and R.S.B), AI100625, and AI108197 to R.S.B. as well as an animal models contract from the NIH (HHSN272201700036I 75N93020F00001) and U54CA260543 sponsored by NCI. K.H.D. was funded by T32AI142759."
Who knows what kind of experiments Baric is doing on MERS as we type. Freaky.
To further support your post.
It didn’t just pop out of the WuHan lab. This has been a deadly evil plan long in the making……. It is a RICO case …
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/it-didnt-just-pop-of-the-wuhan-lab?utm_source=email
NOT TRUE! "any such murine SARS-Cov-2 work done legally ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, would need to have UNC’s permission due to patent protection". US patent protection only applies in the US. A researcher in Ukraine, Canada, China, or anywhere else could practice their evil free of any constraints. The US patent only applies if they attempted to produce, sell or use their virus in the United States.
I smell a rat