I cannot comment on the stats....but only add what was for me a clarifying thought from another substack today. It’s still so hard for us to imagine any government’s participation in a genocide....but it shouldn’t be. Just look at history...too often.
I think I would prefer that all excess mortality end within a 6 month time frame of the final booster (which one would hope is tomorrow). I have 5 children who are fully vaccinated, for reasons ranging from ignorance in the early days of the vaccine rollout (how clever they were to get the jab as soon as it rolled out), to coercion for personal social freedom, to the overwhelming desire to become employed. On the other hand, if increased cancer is one of the side effects, it is unlikely to stop for years, because we can keep people going for years. The same is true for many autoimmune diseases. Many are survivable for a time. In both cases the quality of life is severely diminished, so I am not sure this is in any way a good outcome. I have not been jabbed at all and I do not wish to outlive any of them,
Mortality is getting worse, by those paying any attention such as insurance and funeral companies. 5G installations are happening everywhere all the time, (see images from NY etc.) so those that did not die quickly are beginning to be picked off while they are holding their phones. The injected nano tubes have a patent that explains how they take 5G signal and amplify it, thats what the DOD designed nano tubes to do, and folks are now full of em. So, yeah, the deaths will continue to mount, all causes. Good luck contestants!
Great stuff, Igor. The vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies are unlikely to come from official sources. Reading "Turtles All the Way Down" just now, and the CDC won't even do vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies on all the childhood vaxxes. EVERY study of safety was done against OTHER vaxxes, NOT true placebos. Crazy stuff.
There are those that say that the immune system of the vaxxed is permanently damaged. I think it will be expressed in at least two-- if not more-- different ways. Some will just be sick all the time, and die things like pneumonia, while others won't get colds, they'll wake up one day with stage 4 cancer. The really lucky ones will just get palsy and autoimmune disorders.
"I do not own such a demographics institute, so I use the data I can find."
There's so much in this statement. You SHOULD own such a demographics institute because the US government is a servant of the people, in theory. But, our corrupt, captured, institutions, aren't working on our behalf. Instead, we have independent, individual, prophets like you Igor doing the best they can.
Shame on our government. Shame on our agencies. I had hoped the midterms would reveal the corruption of our apparatchiks, but no. Shame on the American voters. I fear a substantial portion of this country simply wants handouts and strong cannabis.
I think the vaccines were intended to kill the vulnerable quickly and put a ticking time bomb on everyone else along with a reduction in fertility. Why would governments support this? One of their biggest expenditures is pensions...by far. With the implosion of global economies off the back of a 100 years or so on money printing, the economic reckoning is arriving. They know this and need to cut expenditure where they can. Why lower the birth rate? Perhaps to justify migration. Better to have hard working compliant immigrants than demanding entitled citizens. A low birth rate justifies adopting an open border policy to support an economy.
Another ingeniously simple and elegant argument. While I am not happy about the conclusion of these essays, they provide an archetype of what clear thinking should be.
"Will excess mortality get better or worse over time?"
That's the big question for me - will my family members who got the shots a year ago be OK? No one except for a couple of them are getting boosted.
A brother-in-law got forced by Australia to get the shots a little over a year ago, and three months ago developed a turbo cancer in his thyroid. Now his wife has "trigeminal neuralgia", which is a known immediate side effect of the shots, but for her it's a year later.
It's like I'm just waiting for the next health problem in them to pop up, and it's happening more often now.
Interesting thing to consider is this is only over the short interim period. Over five years, with cancer or heart attacks, this rate could be far far higher
I am running my own n=1 test. I did covid19 Ab tests since 2020. I had two negative tests and last month after catching covid in Aug I tested positive for Ab.
I personally feel I am better off. No therapies were offered, I did a few nasal rinses and treated with aspirin after a week. The worst part was the first week running a temp of 102. Never any serious chest congestion a few O2-ox measures that were 93 the first week. It’s a serious bug but I did not have to go to ER. No follow ups about it with my doctor.
This is grim, but I'm still glad you brought it up. I have friends and family who have, for one reason or another, taken the injection. Knowledge is the first step to helping them.
I cannot comment on the stats....but only add what was for me a clarifying thought from another substack today. It’s still so hard for us to imagine any government’s participation in a genocide....but it shouldn’t be. Just look at history...too often.
I think I would prefer that all excess mortality end within a 6 month time frame of the final booster (which one would hope is tomorrow). I have 5 children who are fully vaccinated, for reasons ranging from ignorance in the early days of the vaccine rollout (how clever they were to get the jab as soon as it rolled out), to coercion for personal social freedom, to the overwhelming desire to become employed. On the other hand, if increased cancer is one of the side effects, it is unlikely to stop for years, because we can keep people going for years. The same is true for many autoimmune diseases. Many are survivable for a time. In both cases the quality of life is severely diminished, so I am not sure this is in any way a good outcome. I have not been jabbed at all and I do not wish to outlive any of them,
Mortality is getting worse, by those paying any attention such as insurance and funeral companies. 5G installations are happening everywhere all the time, (see images from NY etc.) so those that did not die quickly are beginning to be picked off while they are holding their phones. The injected nano tubes have a patent that explains how they take 5G signal and amplify it, thats what the DOD designed nano tubes to do, and folks are now full of em. So, yeah, the deaths will continue to mount, all causes. Good luck contestants!
In short, the jabs kill. --Igor Chudov
Great stuff, Igor. The vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies are unlikely to come from official sources. Reading "Turtles All the Way Down" just now, and the CDC won't even do vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies on all the childhood vaxxes. EVERY study of safety was done against OTHER vaxxes, NOT true placebos. Crazy stuff.
There are those that say that the immune system of the vaxxed is permanently damaged. I think it will be expressed in at least two-- if not more-- different ways. Some will just be sick all the time, and die things like pneumonia, while others won't get colds, they'll wake up one day with stage 4 cancer. The really lucky ones will just get palsy and autoimmune disorders.
"I do not own such a demographics institute, so I use the data I can find."
There's so much in this statement. You SHOULD own such a demographics institute because the US government is a servant of the people, in theory. But, our corrupt, captured, institutions, aren't working on our behalf. Instead, we have independent, individual, prophets like you Igor doing the best they can.
Shame on our government. Shame on our agencies. I had hoped the midterms would reveal the corruption of our apparatchiks, but no. Shame on the American voters. I fear a substantial portion of this country simply wants handouts and strong cannabis.
I think the vaccines were intended to kill the vulnerable quickly and put a ticking time bomb on everyone else along with a reduction in fertility. Why would governments support this? One of their biggest expenditures is pensions...by far. With the implosion of global economies off the back of a 100 years or so on money printing, the economic reckoning is arriving. They know this and need to cut expenditure where they can. Why lower the birth rate? Perhaps to justify migration. Better to have hard working compliant immigrants than demanding entitled citizens. A low birth rate justifies adopting an open border policy to support an economy.
Another ingeniously simple and elegant argument. While I am not happy about the conclusion of these essays, they provide an archetype of what clear thinking should be.
Igor, I performed simple analysis of some current government data in Canada. Seems to show a relationship between hospitalizations and vax status. https://open.substack.com/pub/crowdsourcingthetruth/p/govt-admits-boosters-more-hospitalizations?r=z7a89&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
"Will excess mortality get better or worse over time?"
That's the big question for me - will my family members who got the shots a year ago be OK? No one except for a couple of them are getting boosted.
A brother-in-law got forced by Australia to get the shots a little over a year ago, and three months ago developed a turbo cancer in his thyroid. Now his wife has "trigeminal neuralgia", which is a known immediate side effect of the shots, but for her it's a year later.
It's like I'm just waiting for the next health problem in them to pop up, and it's happening more often now.
from Steve Kirsch' substack:
"Did Doug Brignole die from COVID or the vaccine?"
....
"The coroner did not take any tissue samples so we’ll never know for sure."
So a registry of people who demand autopsies if they die, and tissue samples taken as part of those autopsies, is needed.
I would have posted this as a comment to that article but its for paid subscribers only.
question, if the increased risk is 40%, does that result in total expected deaths equal to:
(expected deaths)(1+increased risk)(percent of populated injected)
so for a country with 85% injected:
(expected deaths)(1.4)(0.85) = 1.19 deaths.... a 19% increase for a year
aren't some countries showing these kind of numbers currently?
Interesting thing to consider is this is only over the short interim period. Over five years, with cancer or heart attacks, this rate could be far far higher
I am running my own n=1 test. I did covid19 Ab tests since 2020. I had two negative tests and last month after catching covid in Aug I tested positive for Ab.
I personally feel I am better off. No therapies were offered, I did a few nasal rinses and treated with aspirin after a week. The worst part was the first week running a temp of 102. Never any serious chest congestion a few O2-ox measures that were 93 the first week. It’s a serious bug but I did not have to go to ER. No follow ups about it with my doctor.
This is grim, but I'm still glad you brought it up. I have friends and family who have, for one reason or another, taken the injection. Knowledge is the first step to helping them.