How could Chinese Cave Bats pick the NGVEGF motif from Swine Flu Pandemic?
And how "flu vaccine" destroys kids natural protection
A new study came out that looks at reasons why some people seem to NOT catch Covid-19:
It is very interesting by itself and shows many amazing facts that can be classified as “bombshells”.
Sars-Cov-2 contains a code to make NGVEGF peptide, that, incidentally, exists in H1N1 virus from the infamous “Swine Flu Pandemic”
About 75-80% of people were immunologically protected from the original Sars-Cov-2
Flu vaccination of children destroys or prevents immunity that they could enjoy against Sars-Cov-2
We already know that Sars-Cov-2 has some unnatural and unlikely sequences picked up from HIV, as well as from a Moderna cancer patent. Those specific sequences, mind you, are not in some unused genetic detritus of the Sars-Cov-2 RNA genome, they are occupying crucially important locations of the genetic code, near the furin cleavage site!
The article that I am discussing picked one more interesting finding: Sars-Cov-2 encodes a peptide NGVEGF, which is ONLY present in “Swine Flu” of 2008-2009.
How could bats, sitting in Chinese caves, pick up a peptide from Swine Flu of 2008, is a little bit of a mystery to me. Here’s a picture of this peptide:
NGVEGF, in this picture, is on the tip of the coronavirus spike protein!
Just as the HIV motifs and Moderna cancer patent motifs, this NGVEGF peptide sits at the highly important location called “receptor binding domain”. Without the RBD proteins, the Sars-Cov-2 would not be able to bind to human cells and the pandemic that we are experiencing, very possibly, would not even be a thing. Thus, likely, NGVEGF is not a random genetic “accident”.
The authors of the article make a very straightforward point, saying that many people’s preexisting immunity to NGVEGF being present in flu infections that they experienced, may be the reason why the initial waves of Sars-Cov-2 infected only 20-23% of people.
It further lends credibility to the claim that NGVEGF (mysteriously transplanted from swine flu to Sars-Cov-2) is indeed contributing to protective immune reaction from people who had a flu with the same motif, in the past.
Of course, as we know, Sars-Cov-2 mutated later and was able to infect many more people, and the mutations also changed the NGVEGF peptide to evade prior flu immunity. But NGVEGF did its job in getting the pandemic started to infect 23% of people, after which the virus mutated.
Things get worse from here.
Flu Vaccine Detrimental to Children?
The other bombshell hypothesis from this article, is that “flu vaccination” in children likely leads to their decreased ability to protect against SARS-Cov-2.
It is not my plan to advocate for or against flu vaccine in this article, as it would likely be distracting from the overall message; but clearly, flu does interact with Covid in a very interesting way.
I, personally, would never consider a “flu vaccine” for myself or my children.
To other substack writers reading this post: this scientific article by Almazan et al, is likely a gold mine of other findings. I will be digging into it further but highly recommend that you look at it also. I would love to see you raise issues that I have not considered!
Thanks for reading Igor’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
At least on my country, flu vaccinations are only encouraged for the elderly. Could this be the reason why they were more vulnerable to SARS-COV-2 disease?
One of the mysteries surrounding how something like sars-cov-2 would make an effective bioweapon is the question of how to shelter non-target populations. If you were going to vaccinate for your new virus prior to deploying it, you might tip off the targets. They might be able to acquire and imitate your vaccine quickly, etc.
This paper makes me think of an interesting concept. If the designers include these common flu sequences, then potentially large portions of the population would have some pre-existing protection. These are the non-target population.
If you then inject huge target populations with a vaccine that fixates their immune system on a portion of a virus similar to your bioweapon candidate and then change that portion for the complete bioweapon product, what will happen? The vaccinated produce the wrong response and are seemingly incapable of developing new responses to variant vaccines. Omicron thus looks like a proof of concept here.
Vaccinated are now vulnerable in the long term to repeat sickness, while those who had pre-existing cross-reactive immunity or who developed natural immunity are mostly protected. Only the relatively low mortality rate of sars-cov-2 makes it less than a stunning success.
The Chinese never used mRNA vaccines and I don't believe the Russians have either; however, that doesn't necessarily meant they were the only progenitors of sars-cov-2 since we still have the misanthropic western elites to consider.
The Russian government is saying there was bioweapons research being conducted in US funded labs in Ukraine. There was even a joint statement with China on this Feb. 4th on US violating the bioweapons convention. It was entirely ignored by Western media and you can only find it on Russian sites right now. I hardly trust Russian propaganda, but we've been brought to the point that I trust the intentions and actions of US gov. agencies equally little. At the least, I can say that our massive funding of Wuhan lab makes me suspicious of what other research was being conducted in other US sponsored labs overseas.