On a side note I've worked in a hospital for 15 years. The last 6-9 months the maternity deparment has been insane. What was once a weekly or monthly incident is now happenning every day or far more often. The number of women who go into labour then the alert goes out as something went wrong and she is pushed through into theatre and the docs are calling for blood. Is has happened way to often.
I don't know any stats for how many babies are lost or how many are born with problems I just know what I've seen. I do know that searching the papers for news about strange diseases in new borns gives plenty results for the last year.
Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
A perfectly healthy breast fed NZ baby aged 5 weeks died within a few days of her mother receiving the first pfizer jab. The baby had a massive gastrointestinal bleed resulting in death. This was mid 2021. We alerted the appropriate people but were told we were crazy to connect it. Many deaths since. Lists are being kept separate to the NZ government lists and one day justice will be served.
The speed at which they find these things out is remarkable. Imagine if they did these studies BEFORE recommending poison to nursing moms. What a concept. If people in the real world worked like this, they'd all have been fired a long time ago.
in the summer of 2020, a friend of mine got hired by Pfizer and was managing CV clinical trials. They were experimenting (sorry, doing "clinical tirals") on pregnant women, and WANTED to have the baby born already injected with the poison death jab.
my guess is that the whole breast milk shedding concept is a feature, not a bug.
Do you think this is the cause of the blue-green breast milk being reported?
I know we have previously discussed (and hoped) that shedding only occurs for a brief period (few weeks?) after injection, but I suspect (fear) it is longer than that. How long is the big question since there is no long-term clinical data :-(
Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Is the vaccine a bio-weapon?
Widespread release of an air borne weapon poses a lot of risks and uncertainty. Uncertainty related to wind directions, temperatures and UV light. Uncertainty related to population spread. How do you stop your own allies being inflicted by the disease? What if you didn't release a bio-weapon per se but you instead weaponized the vaccines?
If you exposed 100,000 troops to agent orange, would you expect them to show symptoms straight away, or would those symptoms be delayed by a number of years? Would some however show signs of acute toxicity? Most likely a small handful would, but the majority would only show symptoms years later.
The same is true of most genotoxins and carcinogens. Asbestos, thalidomide or even mitochondrial damage from fluoroquinolone antibiotics (floxed) most often occur months or years later.
If you wanted to use a vaccine as a bio-weapon would you want it to have quick deadly effects and risk raising public alarm, thus limiting the uptake and causing rebellion. Or would it be better for it to seem safe initially so people take it, maybe even multiple times without any idea it's a poison?
Would you prefer the poison to have a single cause of death so doctors treating patients see patterns and then raise alarms, or would it be better to load it with a bunch of concerning mechanisms so one day it's dementia, the next day leukemia and the following a stroke.. those seem pretty unrelated. But what if they're not?
Thank you for posting this. I was on a zoom call with Dr. Lee Merritt quite a long time ago now where she said she knew of a baby who died after breastfeeding from a jabbed mom. I tried sharing that info and people told me she must be mistaken, or she's just another conspiracy theorist dr who doesn't understand "real" science. I continue to be so saddened by this madness-and for those people whose ego will not allow them to even consider the truth. Please keep up your excellent work. I always look forward to your articles.
The biggest villains in all of this is the community of physicians. The vast majority of them stood silent while these vaccines were creating victims. They are the ones who are the final guardian of the patient’s health. Yet they failed miserably. There should be a representative group of people charged with oversight of all the physician organizations. They have demonstrated that they are incapable of protecting their patients best interests.
One by one, the conspiracy theories became confirmed facts - like I always said, conspiracy theories about Covid are facts before their time. Unfortunately, the outrage revealed in that paper was all too predictable. The jabs were tested for an effective 28 day period and failed every standard metric. Pregnant women were excluded from the test set and the Pfraud instructions were clear - those that fell pregnant during the test period had to be removed from the test group. Why? My guess is that the filth at Pfraud knew that this was a going to happen so they tried to minimize the chance that the tests will fail (which they did anyway). Moreover, once the jabbing started, they only tracked pregnant women for 3 months. Again why? Normal pregnancies last for 9 months not 3. What did they know and when did they know it (my guess is again from the beginning)?
In the case of the women that just gave birth, there was no testing whatsoever as far as I can tell from the Pfraud documents. Yet, I have seen sick, sick commercials about jabbing all women to keep them and their young ones "safe".
My question is how did the "safe and effective" message for pregnant women and those that just gave birth ever made it out?
The results here in Oz are heartbreaking - babies from jabbed mothers struggle with bugs that previously were not an issue. What is more infuriating is the gaggle of doctors and media trying to look stumped as to what is the cause for this disaster. The channel 9 piece, about 2 months back, was truly disgusting and the only thing missing was climate change and too much carbon. They have committed an unspeakable crime and like all lowlife scum, their priority is to escape accountability instead of putting an end to this horror. One can tell the type of people these scumbags are because NONE have tried to speak up about it - they all go along with the safe and effective lie. How can these doctors and nurses live with themselves? What kind of monster goes about the daily life knowing what they have done and is still being done. Make no mistake, they definitely KNOW and I hope that they will not escape being held accountable.
On a side note I've worked in a hospital for 15 years. The last 6-9 months the maternity deparment has been insane. What was once a weekly or monthly incident is now happenning every day or far more often. The number of women who go into labour then the alert goes out as something went wrong and she is pushed through into theatre and the docs are calling for blood. Is has happened way to often.
I don't know any stats for how many babies are lost or how many are born with problems I just know what I've seen. I do know that searching the papers for news about strange diseases in new borns gives plenty results for the last year.
A perfectly healthy breast fed NZ baby aged 5 weeks died within a few days of her mother receiving the first pfizer jab. The baby had a massive gastrointestinal bleed resulting in death. This was mid 2021. We alerted the appropriate people but were told we were crazy to connect it. Many deaths since. Lists are being kept separate to the NZ government lists and one day justice will be served.
Now do the blood supply.
Igor, Igor... "chest milk" 😏...
The speed at which they find these things out is remarkable. Imagine if they did these studies BEFORE recommending poison to nursing moms. What a concept. If people in the real world worked like this, they'd all have been fired a long time ago.
Might explain all the babies sick with RSV etc
so, another horror story.
in the summer of 2020, a friend of mine got hired by Pfizer and was managing CV clinical trials. They were experimenting (sorry, doing "clinical tirals") on pregnant women, and WANTED to have the baby born already injected with the poison death jab.
my guess is that the whole breast milk shedding concept is a feature, not a bug.
JAMA is controlled. Hence, it's worse than they say. They just want to front-run from behind like the rest of the clowns switching jerseys.
I dont know whats more disturbing...this story or the fact its not even mentioned by the main stream media
Do you think this is the cause of the blue-green breast milk being reported?
I know we have previously discussed (and hoped) that shedding only occurs for a brief period (few weeks?) after injection, but I suspect (fear) it is longer than that. How long is the big question since there is no long-term clinical data :-(
Is the vaccine a bio-weapon?
Widespread release of an air borne weapon poses a lot of risks and uncertainty. Uncertainty related to wind directions, temperatures and UV light. Uncertainty related to population spread. How do you stop your own allies being inflicted by the disease? What if you didn't release a bio-weapon per se but you instead weaponized the vaccines?
If you exposed 100,000 troops to agent orange, would you expect them to show symptoms straight away, or would those symptoms be delayed by a number of years? Would some however show signs of acute toxicity? Most likely a small handful would, but the majority would only show symptoms years later.
The same is true of most genotoxins and carcinogens. Asbestos, thalidomide or even mitochondrial damage from fluoroquinolone antibiotics (floxed) most often occur months or years later.
If you wanted to use a vaccine as a bio-weapon would you want it to have quick deadly effects and risk raising public alarm, thus limiting the uptake and causing rebellion. Or would it be better for it to seem safe initially so people take it, maybe even multiple times without any idea it's a poison?
Would you prefer the poison to have a single cause of death so doctors treating patients see patterns and then raise alarms, or would it be better to load it with a bunch of concerning mechanisms so one day it's dementia, the next day leukemia and the following a stroke.. those seem pretty unrelated. But what if they're not?
Thank you for posting this. I was on a zoom call with Dr. Lee Merritt quite a long time ago now where she said she knew of a baby who died after breastfeeding from a jabbed mom. I tried sharing that info and people told me she must be mistaken, or she's just another conspiracy theorist dr who doesn't understand "real" science. I continue to be so saddened by this madness-and for those people whose ego will not allow them to even consider the truth. Please keep up your excellent work. I always look forward to your articles.
The biggest villains in all of this is the community of physicians. The vast majority of them stood silent while these vaccines were creating victims. They are the ones who are the final guardian of the patient’s health. Yet they failed miserably. There should be a representative group of people charged with oversight of all the physician organizations. They have demonstrated that they are incapable of protecting their patients best interests.
I sense that Igor is getting more and more angry at all the lies and the damage caused by those fake vaccines. Like all if us. The gloves are off.
One by one, the conspiracy theories became confirmed facts - like I always said, conspiracy theories about Covid are facts before their time. Unfortunately, the outrage revealed in that paper was all too predictable. The jabs were tested for an effective 28 day period and failed every standard metric. Pregnant women were excluded from the test set and the Pfraud instructions were clear - those that fell pregnant during the test period had to be removed from the test group. Why? My guess is that the filth at Pfraud knew that this was a going to happen so they tried to minimize the chance that the tests will fail (which they did anyway). Moreover, once the jabbing started, they only tracked pregnant women for 3 months. Again why? Normal pregnancies last for 9 months not 3. What did they know and when did they know it (my guess is again from the beginning)?
In the case of the women that just gave birth, there was no testing whatsoever as far as I can tell from the Pfraud documents. Yet, I have seen sick, sick commercials about jabbing all women to keep them and their young ones "safe".
My question is how did the "safe and effective" message for pregnant women and those that just gave birth ever made it out?
The results here in Oz are heartbreaking - babies from jabbed mothers struggle with bugs that previously were not an issue. What is more infuriating is the gaggle of doctors and media trying to look stumped as to what is the cause for this disaster. The channel 9 piece, about 2 months back, was truly disgusting and the only thing missing was climate change and too much carbon. They have committed an unspeakable crime and like all lowlife scum, their priority is to escape accountability instead of putting an end to this horror. One can tell the type of people these scumbags are because NONE have tried to speak up about it - they all go along with the safe and effective lie. How can these doctors and nurses live with themselves? What kind of monster goes about the daily life knowing what they have done and is still being done. Make no mistake, they definitely KNOW and I hope that they will not escape being held accountable.
I warned my Friends on Facebook...
...but was censored down to a few people and even they initially resisted the truth