136 Comments

This reminds me of that line in Jurassic Park:

"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think about whether they should."

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

It was never a "conspiracy theory." The conclusion these vaccines could alter DNA was a reasonable conjecture based on the available evidence.

This is in contrast to the conspiracy theory that these vaccines are "safe and effective" when there was no evidence to support this theory, rather there has always been a growing mountain of evidence of the dangers.

Expand full comment

"But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be." - Matthew 24:37

mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing

The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may

Expand full comment

I live in San Francisco killafornia

We have become San frankenfriek with the help of sillycone valley

Frankenstein

This talk of our genes as computer proghrams is metaphor

Reality is still cooler than computers

I am glad Russia blew up the US fucking bioweapon labs in Ukraine

There shouldn't be no fucking bioweapon labs

Yes, I believe in God

Innate immunity

These Harmaceuticals hacksxxxine has to cease

They are so Arrogant they want to needlerape every last member of Womanity

Mind boggling

Avoid sugar please

Regards

Expand full comment

You laid out very compelling arguments against gene editing from both an evolutionary and God based perspective. Even if such technologies worked absolutely perfectly, how can we be sure that the gene we're taking out doesn't serve some functional but unknown purpose?

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Just before the pandemic broke out we were watching multiple documentaries about CRISPR and even a fictional series. We had a lot of discussion with my wife about ethics of gene editing and the complications for humans.

Then a few months later covid broke out and soon people started to speak about mRNA vaccines which is something get injected to your body and gives instructions what to produce. To me it does not have to be proved that mRNA vaccine modifies DNA or not. To me it was immediately similar to CRISPR and it's ethical dilemma. I already questioned just knowing the technology that how are we 100% sure that LNPs will disappear? That our cells stop producing spikes? That LNPs will not go anywhere else and 'hide'? That our cells will not turn against each other indefinitely? All these questions are similar to CRISPR's ones.

Expand full comment

There used to be several presentations online from folks who attended high level meetings where the exciting prospects and mechanisms for gene editing out religious impulses and other factors they thought made people harder to control were discussed. The context was removing these troublesome "traits" from society.

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Can't think of reasons anyone would want to do this - "For example, editing out genes causing people to be nonconformist, may result in subsequent generations being unable to question or resist their masters". Sounds like those silly conspiracy theories ... that keep ending up coming true ...

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This is not a surprise. The only surprise is that they needed some help to do this. In around 2014 or so I was working for a company focused on rare diseases that had a preclinical programme in mRNA that was looking at gene editing to fix things like beta thalassemia, LSDs and so on.

Our CEO used to boast our technology platform was “better than Moderna’s”. Everyone knew and understood the tech could be used for gene editing. The programme didn’t work and was quietly wound up. I don’t know why, but I guess there were some serious issues with it and although our CEO was an erratic individual in many ways (i am putting that nicely), he did have an ethical core to him, and really cared about children. I am not sure one can say the same about Bancel)

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

https://www.newswars.com/wef-linked-bioethicist-called-for-genetically-modifying-humans-to-induce-meat-intolerance/

A bioethicist linked to the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset called for human beings to be genetically engineered to become smaller in size and meat-intolerant to fight “climate change”

During a lecture at the 2016 World Science Festival, Dr. Matthew Liao, director of the College of Global Public Health’s Center for Bioethics at New York University, explained his vision of genetically modifying people in the name of saving the earth.

There’s this thing called the Lone Star tick where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. So that’s something we can do through human engineering. We can possibly address really big world problems through human engineering,” he added.

It gets even better: make the people smaller in order to consume less energy:

But Liao also wants to shrink humans through eugenics or hormone injections so they consume less resources.

In sum, Liao “believes that solving climate change starts with the individual. That’s why he suggests we turn humans into cat-eyed, meat-allergic, semi-genius, hobbit people,” reported Marketplace in 2016.

https://www.marketplace.org/2016/12/15/five-ways-bioethicist-wants-change-our-bodies-fight-climate-change/

Liao’s elitist proposals might seem absurd and immoral, but globalist entities like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Gates Foundation take his philosophies very seriously.

During the WEF’s 2021 Davos Summit, Liao’s 2012 paper “Human Engineering and Climate Change” was brought up during its discussion of the ‘Planetary Health Diet’, a globalist initiative to shift mankind towards plant-based diets and consuming alternative protein sources like insects and synthetic lab-grown meat tissue like the Bill Gates-backed Beyond Meats.

“Last year in December, in preparation for this year’s virtual Davos Summit, the World Economic Forum unveiled its bioengineering framework in a presentation called ‘3 Scenarios for How Bioengineering Could Change Our World in 10 Years’,” BioHackInfo reported in February.

“Edible vaccines grown in plants and CRISPR gene-editing were some of the highlights of the framework. The presentation was based off a World Economic Forum sponsored academic paper called Bioengineering Horizon Scan 2020. For this year’s Davos Summit, Liao’s human bioengineering paper was added for consideration as a possible add-on to the ‘Bioengineering Horizon Scan 2020’ paper for both the World Economic Forum’s bioengineering framework and Climate Change framework as it tackles both topics.”

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

If Moderna's stock keeps falling they might not be doing anything:)

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Thank you Igor for this article!

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022·edited Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

It's disturbing that the patented oncogene in the spike protein is in ALL of us that were infected, not just those that are vaxxed. However, I do take heart for these reasons:

1) the lipid nanotechnology, as discussed in this article, is what makes the vax particularly "targeting" of various body parts - far more than a typical covid infection.

2) the bloodstream delivery of the vax allows the technology to go anywhere and everywhere (again, unlike the natural exposure on our mucous membranes)

3) the slow(er) increase in viral particles gives the body time to amp up its defenses to the virus - limiting which cells it can enter

4) the body is aware it is under attack when naturally exposed to the bioweapon and therefore (I believe) will amp up its defenses to reverse transcriptase (kind of like a cellular lockdown) - this should limit DNA incorporation. The vax was very purposefully designed to trick our body into thinking it's normal to be there, so it gets allowed into almost any cells.

5) like Igor says, the human body is resilient

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

The idea of nerds twiddling my genes using crispr or any other tech their little minds concoct is abhorrent.

The common reductionistic view of living things is demonic. It's the "nothing but.." philosophy in which a complex being with emergent properties is reduced to the sum of its parts.

These people should be isolated and deprived of their power.

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I think that sars-cov-2 was created in a lab and the jab was created to try and fix it so they can test their gene editing technology… it has failed miserably. Both the “virus” (killing millions) and the jab (not effective, killing people, creating other issues, etc)…

So disgusting.

Expand full comment
Mar 13, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

It is a conspiracy theory. Because that doesn’t depend on being true or false. It depends on fitting or not in the official narrative.

Expand full comment