Almost three weeks ago, on Dec 2, I wrote an article “URGENT -- Omicron "variant" likely to be man-made”. I purposely left that article untouched even after new information appeared, that made the conclusion that I came to even more obvious. Very smart and important people such as Eugyppius, also
Dec 21, 2021·edited Dec 21, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov
The idea that Omicron is mild, but produces harmful unseen, undetected effects later, reminds me of streptococcus. Strep throat and scarlet fever can appear to go away, but it can move to the heart when you feel "recovered" and cause rheumatic fever. You won't even know it's happening. (FYI, always treat strep throat with antibiotics.)
Also, I want to point out that fertility is very fragile, and can be affected by very small changes in hormones, including thyroid and sex hormones, Male fertility is also fragile. Many diseases affect both male and female fertility.
I urge everyone to look at that video of Bill & Melinda Gates talking about vaccines in, IIRC, 2019 or maybe a year or two before. They are sat side by side. It is only the last few minutes you need to watch. They say something about people not being able to ignore the next outbreak or pandemic - I forget the exact words - but it is their behaviour that is most telling to me.
They turn and look at one another, give a sort of laugh in that knowing way that smug couples who believe that they are much smarter than everyone else in the room - and who think that no one can even see what they are doing - do.
When I first saw that segment it sent a chill through my body.
I enjoy a bit of speculation if it has foundations in reality, so great article! Have to say that once I was convinced that the original virus came from a lab, I was equally convinced that more would follow. Even if you assume the first one was released by accident (which I am willing to), it opened so many possibilities for so many powerful people/governments that there was no way it would stay with just the one.
When you fire upon or move towards an enemy position, he reacts. By reading that reaction you can learn how his train of thought and chain of logistics function.
You can then confidently launch your real offensive.
This can of course be combined with other offensives.
The end game is either to wreck your opposition to such degree that they no longer can pose a credible threat, or to subjugate and occupy his territory, or to exterminate him. These can obviously be combined.
This can also be labeled competitive, domination, or existential threat. The EU and the US are competitive opponents. The US and Russia are domination oriented enemies. China and the islamic ME are existential threats to the US and the West. However, the opposite doesn't have to be true. Europe is no threat to Russia, MENA or China, not in any way. The US is (or was up until your last election) a domination threat to China, and according to the russian mindset the US is an existential threat to Russia as a sovereign nationstate.
It's as it always is: look to the ancients for the right questions. Who benfits? (Not Pfizer's profits, that's lika analysing a war from the soldier's paycheck.) Whose influence grows from Covid-mania? In what way are our societies weakend? Are they being remodelled based on something new or different?
Remember: the goal of the game is not to win, but to dominate and steer the game your way.
The UK Government's hysterical reaction to omicron did perhaps suggest that there was something more to it than was being let on to the public. Perhaps they believed omicron is a bioweapon and panicked accordingly. Unfortunately, most of what comes out of my country - the UK - is so controlled by vested-interests that it is far from likely that we are being told the truth. Omicron could simply be another part of the fear campaign.
The SA data looks good. The UK data not so much. The world has been insane for almost 2 years, I’m not convinced the first lab leak wasn’t left to run because of Hong Kong and/ or Trump, and I think people destroying others for saying “men can’t actually be women” makes clear insane is currently in charge. My hope is that if it’s option 3 it is some mad scientist ending this without too much fatality (maybe hoping for virtually none - which doesn’t happen). In any event, if it spreads as it appears to, it will end soon. May we only hope some of our freedom, liberty, and future are waiting for the vast majority of us on the other side.
If the vaccines have indeed induced original antigenic sin and will inhibit the formation of new antibody responses to novel coronavirus variants, there will perpetually be waves of new variants. Some of these might be deliberately engineered or accidently leaked from a lab. Eventually, one may be mutated just right to trigger ADE. Wouldn't military bioweapons programs want to rush to create a variant capable of that?
Where some said SARS-COV-2 was stage one of a bioweapon, and the mRNA vaccines were stage two, perhaps there is a stage three that exploits the novel immune system responses induced by the vaccines.
I'm all for contemplating possible but unlikely ideas. However, I think the balance of probability is that CV is not really an ideal bioweapon, and Omi, even less so.
Reading about bioweapons early last year: the general thinking seems to be that high levels of contagiousness are not desirable for a bioweapon, because you lose control of it too easily (it gets to infect people you didn't want to infect, and tends to lose lethality as it spreads, with natural selection favouring less lethal versions). The ideal bioweapon is something like anthrax, which is deadly but not really contagious. This lends itself to targeting people within an area, and killing most of them quickly. Of course, the downside is that it becomes obvious pretty quickly that a bioweapon is being used, and so you can expect retaliatory action.
CV is (post hoc) a great social disruptor, especially when you get to control or at least manipulate the narrative. And the jab is a great bioweapon, very clever too, rolled out all in the name of public health, but totally controllable (potentially, anyway) as to how deadly, and who gets which level of it.
Bioweapons aren't necessarily designed to kill/maim. One mode of action is simply to make everyone preoccupied with the 'new disease' so that they expend too much industrial effort trying to solve the problem and don't notice other things going on (or, don't care about other things going on because they've got 'enough to worry about').
In this regard covid might well be the perfect bioweapon.
Indeed, it could be considered that by targeting mainly the very old and those with serious morbidity, the creators of the purported bioweapon were being (slightly) 'ethical' -- they could have chosen any demographic to attack, but they chose those with fewest years left.
Dec 21, 2021·edited Dec 21, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov
I think that Omicron is simply another artifact of high and undisclosed PCR test cycle thresholds which was only used as an emotional weapon to further turn people against the unvaccinated, since here in the west, the governments are all locking down during the Christmas season again, driving the family further apart. Remember, 'Omicron' originated in the mostly 'unvaccinated' parts of Africa, and the media made sure to draw attention to it right before it was 'released.'
It would be easy to show that 'Omicron' spread rapidly throughout the globe, because if you were ignoring these artifacts of the PCR test before, but are now calling them relevant sequences, all of a sudden you have a massive spread of omicron across the globe. And mostly in vaccinated people, because they're the most fearful, and most likely to be tested.
I personally think just like Delta came from the first batch of vaccines, Omicron came from the “new” recipe for the 5-11 year olds version of the vaccine. Lesser dose for the kids = milder disease makes sense too
Halving the population of the world would collapse our very complex civilization destroying our food production and distribution chains resulting in total chaos.
There are also 4000 spent fuel ponds that require BAU to be completely functional - otherwise the ponds boil off and epic amounts of radiation would be released for thousands of years killing everyone. (Chernobyl was entombed and the ponds were never involved...)
As some of you know, one of my expertise is complex systems, specially cascade dynamics and failures. You know the easiest way to make a complex system crumble into oblivion is the following. Make the cost of producing energy/resources higher than what they give. (EROI)
Any person who has a interest in complex system, complex societies learn this as its first lesson. Throughout history, the easiest way to destroy any complex society is the same. Society spend more energy/resources than it gets. It's the fate of complex societies to collapse. Both the book and this lecture by Joseph Tainter are highly recommended to understanding the last 18 months and the next 56. In complex systems, you can also look up non-linear dynamics papers, there is something called Tipping point cascade. It means that one small thing (node) can have a disproportional impact in the whole system, leading to a literal cascade of failures, because of the severe optimization and overreliance on different stages of the system.
Interdependency is amazing in a well oiled machine, but your Just in Time model becomes a just in time to get fucked if a few “nodes” fail and contagion spreads.
I will exclude all the coincidences and possible hybrid warfare angles to not over-complicate things, for now.
Expensive and failing energy supply makes production and function of a complex society harder, inflation shortly follows, then low yield of food, and everything that entails. Signaling from 2 MONTHS ago, this 1 outstanding podcast episode quite tells you the story of how Europe would freeze the coming winter, how energy would get more expensive, and specially how the green policy virtue signalling is basically a societal suicide.
Baric created a mouse-adapted mutant SARS-CoV-2 at UNC in early 2020, demonstrated cross-infection potential with humans, but only used BioSafety Level 3 for the research - https://unglossed.substack.com/p/mouse-party - Omicron seems to have an affinity for both mice and human ACE2.
Is Baric's mutant the Omicron origin? Maybe. Would explain why Omicron doesn't resemble later human variants. There were other mouse-adapted SC2 studies as well. Any of these may have been the origin. Accidental release seems inevitable. I think Omicron is only a "weapon" in that Baric (or whoever followed his footsteps) wanted more "cases" to drive more vax (the actual weapon).
Dec 21, 2021·edited Dec 21, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov
I think it is just a pathetic cowardice: pro-vaxx politicians, academia, corporations just cannot admit they did put all their bets on a losing horse so they need Omicron to help them out.
1. They'll claim the insanely large case numbers on vaccine evasion of Omicron and not simply on delta-t, that is the time waning of the vaccine protection.
2. They'll attribute the low death numbers to the vaccines and will claim victory.
Of course viruses mutate, and Corona viruses especially so, hence targeting solely the most mutagenic part of the virus, the spike, was a bad idea from the get go. Furthermore the negative vaccine efficacy against symptomatic covid after a 4-7M period is documented in the UK data and the Swedish total population study. So with this respect it is just vaccine failure, not an extremely smart move of the "enemy"
Regarding 2, they'll have to explain why the low vaxxed SA had also a low Omicron death profile. They'll have to explain this to self thinking citizens not to brainwashed followers. Given the numbers, unfortunately they'll have to explain nothing ...
The idea that Omicron is mild, but produces harmful unseen, undetected effects later, reminds me of streptococcus. Strep throat and scarlet fever can appear to go away, but it can move to the heart when you feel "recovered" and cause rheumatic fever. You won't even know it's happening. (FYI, always treat strep throat with antibiotics.)
Also, I want to point out that fertility is very fragile, and can be affected by very small changes in hormones, including thyroid and sex hormones, Male fertility is also fragile. Many diseases affect both male and female fertility.
I urge everyone to look at that video of Bill & Melinda Gates talking about vaccines in, IIRC, 2019 or maybe a year or two before. They are sat side by side. It is only the last few minutes you need to watch. They say something about people not being able to ignore the next outbreak or pandemic - I forget the exact words - but it is their behaviour that is most telling to me.
They turn and look at one another, give a sort of laugh in that knowing way that smug couples who believe that they are much smarter than everyone else in the room - and who think that no one can even see what they are doing - do.
When I first saw that segment it sent a chill through my body.
I enjoy a bit of speculation if it has foundations in reality, so great article! Have to say that once I was convinced that the original virus came from a lab, I was equally convinced that more would follow. Even if you assume the first one was released by accident (which I am willing to), it opened so many possibilities for so many powerful people/governments that there was no way it would stay with just the one.
When you fire upon or move towards an enemy position, he reacts. By reading that reaction you can learn how his train of thought and chain of logistics function.
You can then confidently launch your real offensive.
This can of course be combined with other offensives.
The end game is either to wreck your opposition to such degree that they no longer can pose a credible threat, or to subjugate and occupy his territory, or to exterminate him. These can obviously be combined.
This can also be labeled competitive, domination, or existential threat. The EU and the US are competitive opponents. The US and Russia are domination oriented enemies. China and the islamic ME are existential threats to the US and the West. However, the opposite doesn't have to be true. Europe is no threat to Russia, MENA or China, not in any way. The US is (or was up until your last election) a domination threat to China, and according to the russian mindset the US is an existential threat to Russia as a sovereign nationstate.
It's as it always is: look to the ancients for the right questions. Who benfits? (Not Pfizer's profits, that's lika analysing a war from the soldier's paycheck.) Whose influence grows from Covid-mania? In what way are our societies weakend? Are they being remodelled based on something new or different?
Remember: the goal of the game is not to win, but to dominate and steer the game your way.
"Am I playing into Hands of Lockdown Advocates?"
Doesn't matter. We need the free flow of ideas—always.
The UK Government's hysterical reaction to omicron did perhaps suggest that there was something more to it than was being let on to the public. Perhaps they believed omicron is a bioweapon and panicked accordingly. Unfortunately, most of what comes out of my country - the UK - is so controlled by vested-interests that it is far from likely that we are being told the truth. Omicron could simply be another part of the fear campaign.
The SA data looks good. The UK data not so much. The world has been insane for almost 2 years, I’m not convinced the first lab leak wasn’t left to run because of Hong Kong and/ or Trump, and I think people destroying others for saying “men can’t actually be women” makes clear insane is currently in charge. My hope is that if it’s option 3 it is some mad scientist ending this without too much fatality (maybe hoping for virtually none - which doesn’t happen). In any event, if it spreads as it appears to, it will end soon. May we only hope some of our freedom, liberty, and future are waiting for the vast majority of us on the other side.
If the vaccines have indeed induced original antigenic sin and will inhibit the formation of new antibody responses to novel coronavirus variants, there will perpetually be waves of new variants. Some of these might be deliberately engineered or accidently leaked from a lab. Eventually, one may be mutated just right to trigger ADE. Wouldn't military bioweapons programs want to rush to create a variant capable of that?
Where some said SARS-COV-2 was stage one of a bioweapon, and the mRNA vaccines were stage two, perhaps there is a stage three that exploits the novel immune system responses induced by the vaccines.
I'm all for contemplating possible but unlikely ideas. However, I think the balance of probability is that CV is not really an ideal bioweapon, and Omi, even less so.
Reading about bioweapons early last year: the general thinking seems to be that high levels of contagiousness are not desirable for a bioweapon, because you lose control of it too easily (it gets to infect people you didn't want to infect, and tends to lose lethality as it spreads, with natural selection favouring less lethal versions). The ideal bioweapon is something like anthrax, which is deadly but not really contagious. This lends itself to targeting people within an area, and killing most of them quickly. Of course, the downside is that it becomes obvious pretty quickly that a bioweapon is being used, and so you can expect retaliatory action.
CV is (post hoc) a great social disruptor, especially when you get to control or at least manipulate the narrative. And the jab is a great bioweapon, very clever too, rolled out all in the name of public health, but totally controllable (potentially, anyway) as to how deadly, and who gets which level of it.
Bioweapons aren't necessarily designed to kill/maim. One mode of action is simply to make everyone preoccupied with the 'new disease' so that they expend too much industrial effort trying to solve the problem and don't notice other things going on (or, don't care about other things going on because they've got 'enough to worry about').
In this regard covid might well be the perfect bioweapon.
Indeed, it could be considered that by targeting mainly the very old and those with serious morbidity, the creators of the purported bioweapon were being (slightly) 'ethical' -- they could have chosen any demographic to attack, but they chose those with fewest years left.
I think that Omicron is simply another artifact of high and undisclosed PCR test cycle thresholds which was only used as an emotional weapon to further turn people against the unvaccinated, since here in the west, the governments are all locking down during the Christmas season again, driving the family further apart. Remember, 'Omicron' originated in the mostly 'unvaccinated' parts of Africa, and the media made sure to draw attention to it right before it was 'released.'
It would be easy to show that 'Omicron' spread rapidly throughout the globe, because if you were ignoring these artifacts of the PCR test before, but are now calling them relevant sequences, all of a sudden you have a massive spread of omicron across the globe. And mostly in vaccinated people, because they're the most fearful, and most likely to be tested.
I personally think just like Delta came from the first batch of vaccines, Omicron came from the “new” recipe for the 5-11 year olds version of the vaccine. Lesser dose for the kids = milder disease makes sense too
Halving the population of the world would collapse our very complex civilization destroying our food production and distribution chains resulting in total chaos.
There are also 4000 spent fuel ponds that require BAU to be completely functional - otherwise the ponds boil off and epic amounts of radiation would be released for thousands of years killing everyone. (Chernobyl was entombed and the ponds were never involved...)
As some of you know, one of my expertise is complex systems, specially cascade dynamics and failures. You know the easiest way to make a complex system crumble into oblivion is the following. Make the cost of producing energy/resources higher than what they give. (EROI)
Any person who has a interest in complex system, complex societies learn this as its first lesson. Throughout history, the easiest way to destroy any complex society is the same. Society spend more energy/resources than it gets. It's the fate of complex societies to collapse. Both the book and this lecture by Joseph Tainter are highly recommended to understanding the last 18 months and the next 56. In complex systems, you can also look up non-linear dynamics papers, there is something called Tipping point cascade. It means that one small thing (node) can have a disproportional impact in the whole system, leading to a literal cascade of failures, because of the severe optimization and overreliance on different stages of the system.
Interdependency is amazing in a well oiled machine, but your Just in Time model becomes a just in time to get fucked if a few “nodes” fail and contagion spreads.
I will exclude all the coincidences and possible hybrid warfare angles to not over-complicate things, for now.
Expensive and failing energy supply makes production and function of a complex society harder, inflation shortly follows, then low yield of food, and everything that entails. Signaling from 2 MONTHS ago, this 1 outstanding podcast episode quite tells you the story of how Europe would freeze the coming winter, how energy would get more expensive, and specially how the green policy virtue signalling is basically a societal suicide.
https://worldedge.substack.com/p/the-collapse-of-complex-societies
Baric created a mouse-adapted mutant SARS-CoV-2 at UNC in early 2020, demonstrated cross-infection potential with humans, but only used BioSafety Level 3 for the research - https://unglossed.substack.com/p/mouse-party - Omicron seems to have an affinity for both mice and human ACE2.
Is Baric's mutant the Omicron origin? Maybe. Would explain why Omicron doesn't resemble later human variants. There were other mouse-adapted SC2 studies as well. Any of these may have been the origin. Accidental release seems inevitable. I think Omicron is only a "weapon" in that Baric (or whoever followed his footsteps) wanted more "cases" to drive more vax (the actual weapon).
I think it is just a pathetic cowardice: pro-vaxx politicians, academia, corporations just cannot admit they did put all their bets on a losing horse so they need Omicron to help them out.
1. They'll claim the insanely large case numbers on vaccine evasion of Omicron and not simply on delta-t, that is the time waning of the vaccine protection.
2. They'll attribute the low death numbers to the vaccines and will claim victory.
Of course viruses mutate, and Corona viruses especially so, hence targeting solely the most mutagenic part of the virus, the spike, was a bad idea from the get go. Furthermore the negative vaccine efficacy against symptomatic covid after a 4-7M period is documented in the UK data and the Swedish total population study. So with this respect it is just vaccine failure, not an extremely smart move of the "enemy"
Regarding 2, they'll have to explain why the low vaxxed SA had also a low Omicron death profile. They'll have to explain this to self thinking citizens not to brainwashed followers. Given the numbers, unfortunately they'll have to explain nothing ...