212 Comments

Why is the data still pending on 238 pregnancies? This always seemed very intentional: stop tracking pregnant women before an outcome (either live birth or fetal death). But these women don't stay pregnant forever if they were in a late 2020 trial ALL would have had or lost their babies by now. It's the simplest most obvious thing to track. And the guy writing the factcheck looks about 20 years old and is unlikely to ever be pregnant or breastfeed, no matter what the science says...

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Many will have completely lost trust in the medical establishment over this COVID vaccine programme and who can blame them? The most egregious offence was going outside the high risk groups, i.e. the over 65s. Even if the vaccines had turned out to have a high rate of serious adverse events, as is the case, they could have apologised and claimed it was a worth a try in the vulnerable elderly and not too much damage would have been done in terms of life years lost or loss of trust. Once they went into younger groups and pregnant women, knowing the likely adverse event profile, you can only conclude either a nefarious intent (which could be profits over patients or something worse) or utter incompetence. Either way, they shouldn't ever be trusted again. We need root and branch reform.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

“IF NOTHING ELSE IS LEFT, ONE MUST SCREAM. SILENCE IS THE REAL CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.” – NADEZHDA MANDELSTAM

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I have been reading reports of increasing number of infants / toddlers being hospitalized for Covid19 in the UK.

Makes me wonder if they got the "vax spike" from their breast feeding moms or even during pregnancy. 🤔

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Every Pfizer data release comes with revelations of damage, danger and death. Any one of the batches of so-far-released data should have been enough to stop the use of their product. One wonders what remains hidden.

The company at which I've worked for decades has followed CDC guidance from the beginning of the plandemic. We're still required to wear masks indoors and "social distance." Some bigwigs were in the plant yesterday touring the site with some federal agents - I'm pretty sure they're hoping to convince the government to subsidize operations. This is probably happening all over the country at all big corporations (getting the government involved in operations so government money flows into the company). The result of this will be that these once private companies will be nothing more than government contractors, and they'll be totally dependent on government contracts. This makes it much easier for the government to issue mandates in the "private" sector, by tying contracts to compliance. I do not think the injection mandates are dead; I think the battle lines are merely being redrawn.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This is so absolutely disturbing that I feel sickened reading it.

Not to take away from the information imparted, I can't stop thinking of what I foresee happening as an extension to this horror.

Word will eventually get out and spread, that there is some (small) risk to the infants of vaccinated women: they should not breastfeed. Or out of panic, vaccinated women will not breastfeed. While yes, breast is best and is the most complete food for infants there is a much bigger issue here. Artificial baby milk is extremely expensive, can have feeding and health problems all of its own, is not always readily available, can have manufacturing contamination and is a choice that cannot be reversed; once a mother formula feeds and stops producing milk she cannot switch back to breast when there is no formula available at any price due to the predicted (planned?) food and farming deficits. Most women don't have access to a goat, mare or even donkey and likely are unaware that these animal milks are similar enough to human milk as to be a safe substitute while cow milk is considered difficult for babies to digest.

I recently heard in passing on the radio that there is huge drama in I think Bangladesh (maybe it was Srilanka?) The people were so panicked and locked down during covid the farmers didn't plant and now there isn't enough food. Biden and Trudeau have warned we're going to have food security issues but at the same time they are paying more and more farmers not to grow. They have not offered any plan, any encouragement to help ourselves or our neighbors with gardens, not discussed plans to release food/grain reserves and continue to forbid farmers from planting and pay others to destroy crops. Dairy cows are being culled, farmers don't have grain to feed them. Artificial baby milk is either derived from cow milk, soy, oat or other grain. I already know of someone in England with twins that has had trouble locating baby formula.

We're about to enter a time of infant mortality due to starvation.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

It is a horror story that just will not stop. How could Pfizer release this poison to human beings? Criminal.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Also, there’s mothers from lactating groups who lost their milk, after being vaccinated.

Expand full comment

"Fact checkers" will tell you whatever you want to hear for the cheapest rates around

Expand full comment

Fab find, math isn't my long suit so AE charts with calculated percentages are as far as my analysis goes but anyone able to have the mathematical skill to make change can see red flags all over the place.

What caught my attention was the IRB - Independent Review Board section. here's a total 270 IRB one group affiliated with WHO has almost all the trials.. my list with totals is below.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-fa-interim-iec-irb-consent-form.pdf

page 7 begins US listings.. There's a total 270 IRB and Copernicus group (WCG) affiliated with WHO has almost all the trials... usual suspects scattered in and Indian Health always reeks of abuse... whole thing is stinkier than week old fish.. check WCG links at the bottom.

UNITED STATES

Study Site Number Independent Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board

Copernicus Group Institutional Review Board (248 trials)

5000 CentreGreen Way, Ste 200

Cary, NC 27513

NYU Langone Grossman School of Medicine IRB (1 trial)

One Park Ave, 6th Fl

New York, NY 10016

Kaiser Permanente Northern California Institutional Review Board (2 trials)

1800 Harrison St, 10th Fl

Oakland, CA 94612

Western Institutional Review Board (9 trials)

1019 39th Ave SE, Ste 120

Puyallup, WA 98374

Lehigh Valley Health Network/Institutional Review Board/Research Participant Office (1 trial)

1255 S Cedar Crest Blvd, Ste 3200

Allentown, PA 18103

Indian Health Service National IRB (1 trial)

5600 Fishers Ln, MS 09E10D

Rockville, MARYLAND 20857

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (4 trials)

615 N. Wolfe St, Rm E1100

Baltimore, MARYLAND 21205

Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (3 trials)

Window Rock Blvd, Administration Bldg #2, Division of Health, P.O. Box 1390

Window Rock, ARIZONA 86515

Yale University Human Research Protection Program (Human Investigation Committee) (1 trial)

25 Science Park, 3rd Fl, 150 Munson St

New Haven, CT 06520

It is the mission of the WIRB-Copernicus Group® (WCG) to provide the people who perform clinical trials with the highest quality of services to accelerate the scientific advancement of human health, while ensuring that the risks of progress never outweigh the value of human life.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201030095022/https://www.wcgirb.com/about/international-fellows-program/

WCG IRB’s International Fellows Program is designed for global healthcare professionals who intend to establish or improve institutional review boards (IRBs) in their home countries. Our intensive program helps participants develop the knowledge necessary to create, manage, and/or administer IRBs that comply with the regulations and ethical standards that protect the rights and welfare of human research participants.

The International Fellows Program was founded in 2002 in partnership with the World Health Organization, the National Institutes of Health, and the University of Washington. To date, more than 200 international fellows from across Africa, Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe have graduated, many making significant contributions to the field of clinical research in their home countries.

WCG IRB’s International Fellows Program is designed for global healthcare professionals who intend to establish or improve institutional review boards (IRBs) in their home countries. Our intensive program helps participants develop the knowledge necessary to create, manage, and/or administer IRBs that comply with the regulations and ethical standards that protect the rights and welfare of human research participants.

The International Fellows Program was founded in 2002 in partnership with the World Health Organization, the National Institutes of Health, and the University of Washington. To date, more than 200 international fellows from across Africa, Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe have graduated, many making significant contributions to the field of clinical research in their home countries.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I weep for these mothers and their babies. I just can't fathom how anyone thought it was a good idea to take a vaccine while pregnant. I went back to grad school in the 90s while pregnant and they required some vaccines for attendance (DTAP, maybe but I don't remember for sure). I said I would have to defer until after birth and breastfeeding. I mean, there was just no way I was going to take any drug during my pregnancy or while breastfeeding. It just seems so obvious to me! I got the deferment but eventually they caught up with me. That was the last vaccine I ever took, however I let them vaccinate my son (stupid!) although I pushed off the MMR until he was almost 3 (he's fine but still!). When these mothers come to the realization that their own actions harmed their children (if they haven't already), in addition to the grief, they will suffer a lifetime of guilt.

Expand full comment

Another powerful article Igor. The layers of what the actual F**k keep piling up and one is forced to ask, how was a mistake this big made?

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

"All they said is that it was “safe and effective for pregnant women”. Because science."

And because we have jabs to sell. Profits above babies.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Spike protein laced breast milk hurts babies. And they knew it. There are anecdotes of babies dying after breastfeeding from jabbed moms. Dr McCullough talked about this as did a few others but our useless and corrupt institutions failed us again.

Expand full comment
Apr 2, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Were the mothers vaccinated prior or after giving birth? If they were vaccinated while pregnant, this makes sense. If they were only vaccinated after, then that's pretty scary.

Expand full comment

The crazy thing is that Pfizer's protocol made absolutely clear that pregnancy was to be avoided at all costs. No conspiracy, just the way that Phase II trials are conducted. This information is quite striking and is on pages 65-68 of Pfizer's clinical protocol. See here: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

It even suggested that secondary exposure to pregnant women should be reported to Pfizer. Can't wait to see the data on that one, if we get it and it's not totally redacted.

So, there was NO basis on which to give the vaccine to pregnant women to begin with! Because it wasn't studied to begin with!

Pure madness.

They just constantly moved the goalposts on administering it to pregnant women, and people shut off their brains and assumed all was well.

The children's trials, of course, are too small to say anything conclusively, just as they want. Those who do suffer serious events, such as Maddie de Garay, are hushed up and denied.

Expand full comment