Once again, I am in awe at the elegance and simplicity of the argument and exposition. I'm a math/stats prof, and I say you would make a fine math teacher yourself. Maybe you can start a math website...? ;)
wastewater ? how do they separate the wastewater from jabbed and unjabbed? do the unjabbed P more? I guess Killifornia as a total is a wastwater to be honest. I regret the few good people living there, having to stay because of job or property. I wish we could get them out of there.
Dec 16, 2022·edited Dec 16, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Just so you know, the main way that ALL of California localities have been overstating the effectiveness of vaccination is by overestimating the vaccinated population AND underestimating the total population, which results in a severe underestimate of the unvaccinated.
From Santa Clara County's own website:
"The percent of the total population vaccinated is calculated using an estimated County population of 1,927,470 people, the U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates."
But if you look at the actual 2020 census data, the population of Santa Clara County is 1,936,259. And that is as of 2020. The 2010 census had the population of Santa Clara County at 1,781,642, so we would expect the actual current population to be about 2% higher than the 2020 census estimate.
"The number of people not yet vaccinated by demographic group is based in part on estimates from a population-based survey sample, which is subject to limitations. ... For this reason, the displayed percent of residents vaccinated in a given demographic group is capped at 95%."
The REAL reason they cap the demographic data at 95% is because their raw data show over 100% vaccination rate in older demographics! You used to be able to download these raw data for Santa Clara, but I can't find that functionality anymore. However, you can still download the raw data for vaccination rates in San Francisco by neighborhood: https://data.sfgov.org/COVID-19/COVID-19-Vaccinations-Given-to-SF-Residents-by-Geo/ejrc-vnwu
Note that the number of residents vaccinated significantly EXCEEDS the total population in many neighborhoods, including the second row, which is the largely black neighborhood of Bayview. According to the raw data, SF's vaccination rate for residents of Bayview is 41,184 count_vaccinated divided by 37,917 subgroup _population, a vaccination rate of 108.6%!
Thank you, Igor. I wondered how this was done. It took some diligence and brains to do this. Too bad they couldn’t do it for good rather than evil. Such is the world we live in.
Dec 16, 2022·edited Dec 16, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Anti-vaxer cop-killers rigged remote house for ambush. Top news story headline The Australian news paper Thurs Dec 15 2022. I haven’t found any relevance to vaccines to this tragic story anywhere. How disgracefully disrespectful to the police who lost their lives in this tragic event to manipulate this story in order to suit the MSM irrelevant agenda and narrative.
Dec 16, 2022·edited Dec 16, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
The most important data fake I think you mentioned is the two week lag post injectioning to be considered killed, umm, I mean doped, duped, and delivered.
They wait two weeks to exclude the worst injured and dead, who don't count.
I have a small Point of Sales company in Portland Oregon. Something very serious is happening in my opinion. I had several store owners get injured, one had a son die andother had a manager who was 40 die. But now everyone is sick constantly...most of the vaxxed have had covid and or a cold already this year.....Something just isnt right.
Dec 16, 2022·edited Dec 16, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
I've heard in other instances that upon hospital admission - if you don't have your AgendaID2020 "I've been 5× jabbed" card in your pocket, to prove your status... They list you as unvaccinated.
Also, are they actually counting 2× jabbed folks from January of 2021 as "vaccinated", still? I suspect that they're only counting those whose 'boosting' is still in the effective window of a month or two (maybe six) as "vaccinated". Otherwise, you'd expect that the point at which the jabs reach negative effectiveness - would be putting their stats lopsided, in the other direction.
How do they count their cases? We have lots of evidence most of the statistics we've been shown are inaccurate at best, or fraudulent. We'll need much more detailed investigation to estimate what the real numbers are. Garbage in, garbage out.
Considering that the vax is for strains of sars2 that are no longer prevalent, and has been proven to degrade immune function, not improve it, and the neighboring counties of this densely populated area had much different results, their conclusion is certainly wrong. If I was interested (I'm not), I'd be investigating their data collection.
What we really need is competent determination of what the biological effects of the vax are (by lot number, which apparently varies), and diagnostics for those effects. We should be able to test anyone and determine their pathogens, immune status, and whether vaxed. We can't, because we don't. We don't because the prime directive of the corrupt government-industrial medical complex is to sell vax to everyone, repeatedly, forever. It keeps the population frightened and submissive, and is highly profitable to legions of corrupt grifters from the president down to the hospital janitors. The objective and our single focus needs to be on making it stop. We can figure out the details later.
"What other data-faking methods do they use?" Well, it may be a small number, but those who died from the jab are permanently and completely immune from further Covid cases. If they're still counted among the vaccinated, that would be fakery.
Once again, I am in awe at the elegance and simplicity of the argument and exposition. I'm a math/stats prof, and I say you would make a fine math teacher yourself. Maybe you can start a math website...? ;)
Commiefornia just following their big pharma and CDC fraud masters. Their holiday bonuses probably depend on jabs sold, commission basis.
We can catch them just like this. We should think of more ways. Good work.
It's not surprising at all. Our authorities have the worst possible combination of incompetency, dishonesty and wickedness.
Thank you for your hard work uncovering them.
wastewater ? how do they separate the wastewater from jabbed and unjabbed? do the unjabbed P more? I guess Killifornia as a total is a wastwater to be honest. I regret the few good people living there, having to stay because of job or property. I wish we could get them out of there.
Just so you know, the main way that ALL of California localities have been overstating the effectiveness of vaccination is by overestimating the vaccinated population AND underestimating the total population, which results in a severe underestimate of the unvaccinated.
From Santa Clara County's own website:
"The percent of the total population vaccinated is calculated using an estimated County population of 1,927,470 people, the U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates."
But if you look at the actual 2020 census data, the population of Santa Clara County is 1,936,259. And that is as of 2020. The 2010 census had the population of Santa Clara County at 1,781,642, so we would expect the actual current population to be about 2% higher than the 2020 census estimate.
"The number of people not yet vaccinated by demographic group is based in part on estimates from a population-based survey sample, which is subject to limitations. ... For this reason, the displayed percent of residents vaccinated in a given demographic group is capped at 95%."
The REAL reason they cap the demographic data at 95% is because their raw data show over 100% vaccination rate in older demographics! You used to be able to download these raw data for Santa Clara, but I can't find that functionality anymore. However, you can still download the raw data for vaccination rates in San Francisco by neighborhood: https://data.sfgov.org/COVID-19/COVID-19-Vaccinations-Given-to-SF-Residents-by-Geo/ejrc-vnwu
Note that the number of residents vaccinated significantly EXCEEDS the total population in many neighborhoods, including the second row, which is the largely black neighborhood of Bayview. According to the raw data, SF's vaccination rate for residents of Bayview is 41,184 count_vaccinated divided by 37,917 subgroup _population, a vaccination rate of 108.6%!
Frankly, I don’t think it matters if they are caught. One either follows this cult, or not, math will not make a difference.
Thank you, Igor. I wondered how this was done. It took some diligence and brains to do this. Too bad they couldn’t do it for good rather than evil. Such is the world we live in.
Anti-vaxer cop-killers rigged remote house for ambush. Top news story headline The Australian news paper Thurs Dec 15 2022. I haven’t found any relevance to vaccines to this tragic story anywhere. How disgracefully disrespectful to the police who lost their lives in this tragic event to manipulate this story in order to suit the MSM irrelevant agenda and narrative.
Once again ... nice going, Igor! (Foot surgery seems to not be diminishing brain capacity.)
The most important data fake I think you mentioned is the two week lag post injectioning to be considered killed, umm, I mean doped, duped, and delivered.
They wait two weeks to exclude the worst injured and dead, who don't count.
Don't die if you want to be counted.
I have a small Point of Sales company in Portland Oregon. Something very serious is happening in my opinion. I had several store owners get injured, one had a son die andother had a manager who was 40 die. But now everyone is sick constantly...most of the vaxxed have had covid and or a cold already this year.....Something just isnt right.
I've heard in other instances that upon hospital admission - if you don't have your AgendaID2020 "I've been 5× jabbed" card in your pocket, to prove your status... They list you as unvaccinated.
Also, are they actually counting 2× jabbed folks from January of 2021 as "vaccinated", still? I suspect that they're only counting those whose 'boosting' is still in the effective window of a month or two (maybe six) as "vaccinated". Otherwise, you'd expect that the point at which the jabs reach negative effectiveness - would be putting their stats lopsided, in the other direction.
How do they count their cases? We have lots of evidence most of the statistics we've been shown are inaccurate at best, or fraudulent. We'll need much more detailed investigation to estimate what the real numbers are. Garbage in, garbage out.
Considering that the vax is for strains of sars2 that are no longer prevalent, and has been proven to degrade immune function, not improve it, and the neighboring counties of this densely populated area had much different results, their conclusion is certainly wrong. If I was interested (I'm not), I'd be investigating their data collection.
What we really need is competent determination of what the biological effects of the vax are (by lot number, which apparently varies), and diagnostics for those effects. We should be able to test anyone and determine their pathogens, immune status, and whether vaxed. We can't, because we don't. We don't because the prime directive of the corrupt government-industrial medical complex is to sell vax to everyone, repeatedly, forever. It keeps the population frightened and submissive, and is highly profitable to legions of corrupt grifters from the president down to the hospital janitors. The objective and our single focus needs to be on making it stop. We can figure out the details later.
Nobody on any "side" trusts any data, period.
They may use it if it supports what they already believe.
"What other data-faking methods do they use?" Well, it may be a small number, but those who died from the jab are permanently and completely immune from further Covid cases. If they're still counted among the vaccinated, that would be fakery.