This was almost embarrassing to read. Public Health will (and should) never recover when people discover what is being done. Wish this could get more exposure -- can you get one of the UK papers to pick it up? Would be worth the exposure.
They know that within another month or two those triple-vaxxed people will lose their recent "boost" of fake immunity and start dying at a faster rate than the unvaxxed, just like the double-vaxxed folks. They've got to stop the data flow before then.
We’re going to stop publishing our evidence of vaccine effectiveness because it is being inappropriately used to demonstrate it’s ineffectiveness.
We will be adjusting our published metrics to ensure future data releases are no longer misinterpreted, clearly showing how safe and highly effective it is.
"Vaccines are effective at reducing the risk of severe outcome..."
Point is that these vaccines have NOT been authorized for THAT.
Applications made by manufacturers as well as authorizations given based on these applications state clearly these are FOR PREVENTION of infection. Now, correct me if I'm wrong but these are TWO different things.
An ethical and legally appropriate process would require
1) authorizations given so far revoked as failed and
2) asking manufacturers to apply for whatever these product indeed are capable of doing.
According to data shown these products are therapeutics only. Given in advance.
Most annoying is the constant public service announcement that “evidence suggests the Covid vaccine reduces the risk of severe outcome”. They never provide the evidence because there really is none. How do you prove that a vaccinated person had a better outcome without the benefit of their unvaxxed doupleganger. This is classic sales pitch stuff - science should have data that speaks for itself. It should not need marketing techniques.
Did you know China never used the mRNA vaccine to fight off the WuFlu? They continue to talk about making their own mRNA vaccine….but never really have. It is still in testing. I wonder why that is? Maybe….just maybe…they know how deadly it is!
Needs to be an uproar over objective recording vs "appropriate." What is truly appropriate is that they do their statutory duty and report correctly. Bastards. They must be subjected to pressure, shaming, lawfare and filing of criminal cases for failure to perform duties, recklessly refusing to perform statutory duties and ore. Grrr, every way. Their lack of transparency brands them as liars and worse.
Lots of issues to unpack here. The vaccinated are less likely to be tested than the unvaccinated. A lot of vaccinated people are still under the impression that they are protected from Covid and if they get a cold like illness they will assume its a cold. The unvaccinated in the UK were FORCED to get tested if they wanted to get access to social events. You had either to provide proof of vaccination or a negative test within a specified period. Cases were always irrelevant anyway. The only important data is deaths which as VAIDS takes immunity down past -100% are expected to increase very rapidly in the vaccinated cohorts.
This was almost embarrassing to read. Public Health will (and should) never recover when people discover what is being done. Wish this could get more exposure -- can you get one of the UK papers to pick it up? Would be worth the exposure.
They know that within another month or two those triple-vaxxed people will lose their recent "boost" of fake immunity and start dying at a faster rate than the unvaxxed, just like the double-vaxxed folks. They've got to stop the data flow before then.
We’re going to stop publishing our evidence of vaccine effectiveness because it is being inappropriately used to demonstrate it’s ineffectiveness.
We will be adjusting our published metrics to ensure future data releases are no longer misinterpreted, clearly showing how safe and highly effective it is.
"Vaccines are effective at reducing the risk of severe outcome..."
Point is that these vaccines have NOT been authorized for THAT.
Applications made by manufacturers as well as authorizations given based on these applications state clearly these are FOR PREVENTION of infection. Now, correct me if I'm wrong but these are TWO different things.
An ethical and legally appropriate process would require
1) authorizations given so far revoked as failed and
2) asking manufacturers to apply for whatever these product indeed are capable of doing.
According to data shown these products are therapeutics only. Given in advance.
That was a lot of words to say,
"We screwed up, the vaxx doesn't work, enjoy your side-effects, please don't blame us!!!"
Most annoying is the constant public service announcement that “evidence suggests the Covid vaccine reduces the risk of severe outcome”. They never provide the evidence because there really is none. How do you prove that a vaccinated person had a better outcome without the benefit of their unvaxxed doupleganger. This is classic sales pitch stuff - science should have data that speaks for itself. It should not need marketing techniques.
Did you know China never used the mRNA vaccine to fight off the WuFlu? They continue to talk about making their own mRNA vaccine….but never really have. It is still in testing. I wonder why that is? Maybe….just maybe…they know how deadly it is!
These people have blood on their hands! How do they live with themselves?! For the life of me I can’t figure out why more people don’t come forward.
Needs to be an uproar over objective recording vs "appropriate." What is truly appropriate is that they do their statutory duty and report correctly. Bastards. They must be subjected to pressure, shaming, lawfare and filing of criminal cases for failure to perform duties, recklessly refusing to perform statutory duties and ore. Grrr, every way. Their lack of transparency brands them as liars and worse.
Criminals
The thing is ...
Why bother hiding the data? You can show a CovIDIOT the data and they will respond by going to get another booster shot.
Because .. they are... STUPID. They are... MOREONS.... They do what they are told.
HOW DO YOU COVER UP A VACCINE GENOCIDE ?
Blame it all on the deadly virus they made.
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/how-do-you-cover-up-a-vaccine-genocide
Dark Ages
Data manipulation:
It is what "Hanged Drawn and Quartered" was invented to avoid.
Lots of issues to unpack here. The vaccinated are less likely to be tested than the unvaccinated. A lot of vaccinated people are still under the impression that they are protected from Covid and if they get a cold like illness they will assume its a cold. The unvaccinated in the UK were FORCED to get tested if they wanted to get access to social events. You had either to provide proof of vaccination or a negative test within a specified period. Cases were always irrelevant anyway. The only important data is deaths which as VAIDS takes immunity down past -100% are expected to increase very rapidly in the vaccinated cohorts.
The truth must be getting out so they need to assert control over the counting. I bet they "discover" that the unvaccinated are to blame again.