Will UKHSA also Hide Vaccinated and Boosted Deaths?
Scotland folded; UKHSA next?
I wrote an article yesterday about Scotland deciding to HIDE deaths of vaccinated and boosted people, in order to not provide truthful materials for “Antivaxxer misinformation”.
Oddly enough, Scotland did not decide to actually look into this, or study specific vaccinated people who are dying at greater rates than vaccine-free people, to figure out what is happening. Scotland did not also try to find ways to save the poor dying vaccinated people either.
Instead, Scotland’s health officials decided to simply stop reporting deaths among vaccinated and boosted people. The vaccine, you see, is so safe and effective, that it does not need no stinking reporting.
The question is, will UKHSA fold also and stop reporting vaccinated cases and deaths? The weekly vaccine report is so terrible that, I am sure, there is a lot of pressure on UKHSA to stop reporting this inconvenient data.
As 90-day reinfections started to count after Jan 31, the four weeks covered by the UKHSA report now include two weeks of reinfections. As the vaccinated people are much more likely to be reinfected, this change in counting further illustrated the vaccine disaster, as the boosted case rates in some categories are THREE TIMES greater than unvaccinated case rates.
Let this sink in: the boosted 40-49 year olds, protected by TRIPLE DOSE of spike protein goodness, are THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO CATCH COVID, than the vaccine-free. A huge part of this now is reinfections.
The death protection, still conferred to the “boosted” by the vaccine, is going down every week
All of this makes me apprehensive that UKHSA will soon stop reporting deaths and cases in the vaccnated people, due to pressure to hide the disaster that is unfolding in the UK.
Here’s a typical attack article on UKHSA from so called “fact checkers”:
Just How Bad is the Latest Report?
Whilst cases among vaccine-free Brits decreased by 20%, the cases among boosted persons decreased only by 5%.
This data comes from page 44:
So we can see that the boosted people are kind of having it rough at the moment and have 2-3 times the number of “Covid Cases” compared to the vaccine-free.
Whilst the booster still provides “death protection”, the degree of this protection drops every week, sadly. I keep track of this in a spreadsheet for you:
Circled are last week’s calculations of “Vaccine Effectiveness” (VE) in preventing death, by age category. Very disturbing pattern is a freefall in protection for the youngest 19-29 age category. I hope that this is simply a result of data fluke and not development of immune deficiency in your youngest and most precious UK adults.
However, where death numbers really matter, is older categories and there, the decline in VE is precipitous. For example, in 80+ the drop in VE is 7%. For 60-69, it is 8%. These are our most vulnerable citizens and they see the worst declines in booster protection.
What will be the fate of the boosted once vaccine protection wanes completely? You can compare then to “double vaccinated” whose protection waned long ago. In Scotland, the double vaccinated have GREATER death rates than vaccine-free due to immune system damage from the shots.
Whilst the effectiveness of the jabs in preventing deaths wanes, the damage to immune systems does not wane. As the boosted had one more dose of damaging “vaccines”, their fate will likely be worse than the never-vaccinated.
It is untenable that a pro-vax government has a health agency that publishes TRUTHFUL statistics showing their vax policy failure. Only one of the two things will happen: the vaccinators will be fired, or UKHSA will stop publishing.
Which would you prefer?